Sudarshan Pharma promoters pledge 1.33 crore shares to Satin Finserv
- Hemal V Mehta and Sachin V Mehta each pledged 66.50 lakh shares
- Encumbrance created in favor of Satin Finserv Limited on August 25, 2026
- Reason cited as security for loans taken by third parties
- Total encumbered holding for both promoters rises to 5.21%
- Disclosures filed under SEBI SAST Regulations 31(1) and 31(2)
*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Sudarshan Pharma Industries promoters Hemal V Mehta and Sachin V Mehta pledged a combined 1.33 crore equity shares on August 25, 2026. The encumbrance was created in favor of Satin Finserv Limited as security for loans taken by third parties.
Pledge Details
Both promoters disclosed the creation of pledges under Regulation 31(1) and 31(2) of the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011. The disclosures were filed with BSE Limited on August 26, 2026.
| Promoter | Shares Pledged | % of Capital | Pre-existing Encumbered Shares | Total Encumbered Post-Event |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hemal V Mehta | 66,50,000 | 2.61% | 66,00,000 | 1,32,50,000 (5.21%) |
| Sachin V Mehta | 66,50,000 | 2.61% | 66,00,000 | 1,32,50,000 (5.21%) |
Hemal V Mehta holds 6,85,21,020 shares, representing 26.93% of the total share capital. Sachin V Mehta holds 7,07,05,470 shares, accounting for 27.79% of the total share capital.
What the Numbers Show
The new pledge increases the total encumbered stake for both promoters to 5.21% of the company’s total share capital. This indicates that roughly one-fifth of each promoter’s individual holding is now pledged, as Hemal V Mehta’s encumbered portion rises from 2.59% to 5.21%, and Sachin V Mehta’s follows the identical trajectory.
Historical Stock Returns for Sudarshan Pharma Industries
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0.85% | +4.85% | -2.85% | +43.44% | +15.66% | 0.0% |
How might the increased pledge ratio of 5.21% impact Sudarshan Pharma's credit rating or future borrowing capacity?
Given that the loans are for third parties, what are the potential risks to the promoters' control if those third-party obligations default?
Will this additional encumbrance influence institutional investors' confidence in the company's corporate governance and promoter stability?
20
Create Custom Screeners 
Access 200+ Pre-built Filters 
Use 50+ Readymade Screener 
