SPV Global Trading net profit up to ₹25,459 lakh in FY26 on subsidiary sale
- Net profit rose to ₹25,459.95 lakh in FY26 from a loss of ₹2.19 lakh in FY25
- Gain driven by ₹30,714.64 lakh exceptional item from Rashtriya Metal Industries sale
- Revenue from operations fell 50% to ₹1,186.27 lakh
- AGM scheduled for September 29, 2026 with remote e-voting facility
- Board seeks approval to raise borrowing limit to ₹500 crore

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
SPV Global Trading reported a net profit of ₹25,459.95 lakh for the financial year ended March 31, 2026 (FY26), marking a sharp turnaround from a net loss of ₹2.19 lakh in FY25. The result was driven primarily by an exceptional gain from the sale of its material subsidiary, Rashtriya Metal Industries Limited.
The company’s 41st Annual General Meeting (AGM) is scheduled for Tuesday, September 29, 2026, at 2:30 pm at its registered office in Mumbai. Shareholders holding shares as of the cut-off date, September 22, 2026, are eligible to vote via remote e-voting between September 26 and September 28, 2026. The book closure period runs from Wednesday, September 23, 2026, to Tuesday, September 29, 2026 (both days inclusive).
Financial Performance
Revenue from operations declined to ₹1,186.27 lakh in FY26, down from ₹2,405.18 lakh in the previous year. However, other income surged to ₹96.69 lakh from ₹0.32 lakh, largely due to interest income and fair value gains on investments.
The operational business incurred a loss before tax of ₹995.16 lakh, compared to a minimal loss of ₹2.93 lakh in FY25. This operational deficit was more than offset by an exceptional item of ₹30,714.64 lakh, representing the profit on the disposal of the subsidiary.
| Metric | FY26 (₹ lakh) | FY25 (₹ lakh) |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue from Operations | 1,186.27 | 2,405.18 |
| Other Income | 96.69 | 0.32 |
| Profit/(Loss) Before Tax | (995.16) | (2.93) |
| Exceptional Items | 30,714.64 | - |
| Net Profit After Tax | 25,459.95 | (2.19) |
What the Numbers Show
The financial results highlight a complete divergence between operational performance and bottom-line profitability. While revenue from core trading activities contracted by over 50%, the net profit figure is entirely non-operational in nature. The exceptional gain of ₹30,714.64 lakh constitutes virtually the entire net profit for the year, indicating that the company’s current earnings power is not reflective of its ongoing trading business but rather a one-time capital restructuring event.
Key Corporate Actions
The Board of Directors does not recommend a dividend for FY26. No amount has been transferred to reserves. The company’s paid-up share capital remains unchanged at ₹1.96 crore.
During the year, the company sold its entire 54.90% stake in Rashtriya Metal Industries Limited to Gravita India Limited for a consideration of approximately ₹310.17 crore. Following this transaction, Rashtriya Metal Industries ceased to be a subsidiary.
Board Changes and Resolutions
The AGM agenda includes several special resolutions:
- Approval to increase the limit for investments, loans, guarantees, and advances to ₹350 crore under Section 186 of the Companies Act, 2013.
- Approval to increase borrowing power to ₹500 crore under Section 180(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013.
- Appointment of Mr. Anil Kumar Bagri and Mr. Suresh Kishanlal Mundra as Non-Executive Independent Directors for a five-year term.
Mr. Navratan Bhairuratan Damani retires by rotation and offers himself for re-appointment. Mr. Dhiren Bontra resigned from the board effective August 12, 2026.
Historical Stock Returns for SPV Global Trading
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +38.68% |
How will SPV Global Trading deploy the capital from the subsidiary sale given the approved increase in borrowing power to ₹500 crore and investment limits to ₹350 crore?
What is the strategic rationale behind retaining a trading business that saw revenue decline by over 50% while incurring an operational loss of nearly ₹10 crore?
How might the appointment of independent directors from prominent industrial families influence the company's future corporate governance and strategic direction?


































