SpaceX stock drops 12% as $18.4B AI capex overshadows Q2 revenue beat
SpaceX reported Q2 revenue of $7.81 billion, beating estimates, but shares fell 12% due to $18.37 billion in capex. The company is shifting toward an AI infrastructure model, leasing compute power to external clients, which raises questions about long-term profitability and valuation multiples.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Space Exploration Technologies Corp (NASDAQ: SPCX) shares fell 12.08% to $110.19 on Wednesday after second-quarter results revealed that surging artificial intelligence expenditures are overshadowing strong top-line growth. The company reported revenue of $7.81 billion, nearly doubling from $4.07 billion in the prior year period and exceeding the $6.93 billion consensus estimate. Despite the revenue beat and a narrower-than-expected loss per share of nine cents versus an estimated 24 cent loss, investors reacted negatively to deteriorating unit economics and massive capital outlays totaling $18.37 billion.
The financial performance was driven by robust growth in the Connectivity and AI segments. Starlink revenue climbed 66% to $4.29 billion as subscribers doubled to 12 million. The AI segment surged 247% to $2.56 billion, while the Space segment advanced 29% to $962 million. However, the net loss for the quarter totaled $143 million, contributing to a cumulative first-half loss of $2 billion. Total quarterly expenditures ballooned to more than six times the year-ago level, with AI investment responsible for the overwhelming majority of this expansion.
Operational Headwinds
Despite year-over-year growth, sequential trends revealed underlying pressures. Starlink’s average revenue per user (ARPU) held at $66 per month in the second quarter, flat from the first quarter but down roughly 22% from the $85 recorded a year earlier. This compression raises concerns about per-user economics as the platform expands into less affluent markets. Additionally, revenue moved lower on a sequential basis from the second half of 2025 into the first half of 2026, undercutting the narrative of uninterrupted momentum.
The Space segment faced operational challenges, including a quarter-over-quarter decline in Falcon launches and mass delivered to orbit. This pullback weighed on the division, which generated an operating loss of $542 million. Meanwhile, the AI segment added another $1.26 billion in operating losses. Connectivity remained the only division contributing positively to the bottom line, with an operating profit of $1.66 billion.
Capital Intensity and Neocloud Strategy
Total capital spending reached $18.37 billion, including $15.83 billion dedicated to AI infrastructure. This expenditure underscores the strategic pivot toward artificial intelligence following the absorption of xAI in February. CEO Elon Musk defended the outlay, stating, "We’re building AI compute capacity at scale faster than anyone else, we believe, and we’re significantly improving our AI models."
Bob O’Donnell, president and chief analyst at TECHnalysis Research, told Bloomberg that much of SpaceX’s AI infrastructure is leased to outside customers rather than reserved for its own models. "They’re becoming as much of a neocloud company as they are an AI company," O’Donnell said, noting that revenue from selling Grok models "hasn’t been as big" as what OpenAI and Anthropic generate. This strategy turns excess capacity into revenue while the Grok business develops, acting as a hedge against competitors staying ahead in the model race.
Related Parties and Market Sentiment
Related-party transactions with Tesla Inc. continued to deepen. SpaceX purchased $295 million of Tesla Megapack batteries in the second quarter, bringing first-half Megapack purchases to $329 million. Cumulatively, SpaceX had bought $506 million of these batteries and $131 million of Cybertrucks by the end of 2025. These deals reflect the intertwined nature of Musk’s companies, with Tesla stating that Megapacks provide reliable data-center power.
Merger speculation between Tesla and SpaceX continues to influence sentiment. Artemis Investment Management’s Harry Eastwood stated that a merger "makes sense," while Wedbush’s Dan Ives placed the odds at 80% to 90%. However, skepticism remains regarding dilution, with Future Fund’s Gary Black estimating a potential 28% dilution for Tesla shareholders. Regulatory hurdles, particularly concerning Tesla’s China operations and SpaceX’s U.S. defense contracts, also pose complications.
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between Starlink’s profitability and the AI segment’s losses illustrates a dual-track growth strategy. While Starlink contributes stable cash flow, the AI unit burns through capital at a rapid pace. The $15.83 billion in AI infrastructure spending represents a substantial portion of total capital expenditure, signaling a long-term bet on compute capacity over short-term earnings. Furthermore, the decline in ARPU alongside rising subscriber counts suggests a trade-off between market penetration and margin preservation.
| Metric | Value | Change / Note |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.81 billion | Beat $6.93B consensus; up 92% YoY |
| Net Loss | $143 million | Cumulative H1 loss of $2 billion |
| Starlink Revenue | $4.29 billion | Up 66% YoY; ARPU down 22% |
| AI Revenue | $2.56 billion | Up 247% YoY; Op loss $1.26B |
| Space Revenue | $962 million | Up 29% YoY; Op loss $542M |
| Total Capex | $18.37 billion | $15.83B for AI infrastructure |
How will the compression in Starlink's ARPU impact long-term profitability as SpaceX expands into less affluent global markets?
Can SpaceX's 'neocloud' strategy of leasing AI infrastructure generate sufficient revenue to offset the $15.83 billion quarterly capital outlay before competitors catch up?
What are the potential regulatory and financial implications for Tesla shareholders if a merger with SpaceX proceeds, particularly regarding estimated dilution and defense contract restrictions?

































