Luxury Time gets final compounding order; directors pay ₹5 lakh fee
- Luxury Time received final compounding order from MCA on September 21, 2026
- Directors paid ₹1,00,000 per year for five years of Section 129 defaults
- No compounding fee payable by the company; balance sheet impact nil
- Defaults related to non-filing of consolidated financials for joint venture
- Rectification of records completed in FY25 financial statements
*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Luxury Time Limited received a final compounding order dated September 21, 2026, from the Office of the Regional Director (Northern Region-I), Ministry of Corporate Affairs. The order resolves defaults under Section 129 of the Companies Act, 2013, regarding the non-preparation and filing of consolidated financial statements for its joint venture across five fiscal years.
The default spanned FY20, FY21, FY22, FY23, and FY24. The Regional Director compounded the offence under Section 441 of the Companies Act, 2013. The order specifies that no compounding fee is payable by the company itself. Instead, the fee was borne by the applicant directors, Mr. Ashok Goel and Mr. Pawan Chohan.
Fee Payment and Compliance Details
The compounding fee of ₹1,00,000 for each year of default was paid by the directors on September 3, 2026. This amounts to a total payment covering the five-year period of non-compliance. The Regional Director’s order confirms that in view of this payment, the offence has been compounded in respect of the applicants.
The Registrar of Companies, Delhi-II (Central Delhi), reported that no complaints were pending against the company, no prosecution had been filed, and the offence had not been compounded in the preceding three years. Crucially, the omissions in the financial statements for the affected years were rectified in the financial statements for FY25.
| Particulars | Details |
|---|---|
| Authority | Office of the Regional Director (Northern Region-I) |
| Order Date | September 21, 2026 |
| Default Period | FY20 to FY24 |
| Fee Paid By | Mr. Ashok Goel and Mr. Pawan Chohan |
| Fee Amount | ₹1,00,000 per year |
| Company Liability | Nil |
What the Numbers Show
The resolution highlights a clear separation of liability between the corporate entity and its management. While the company faced regulatory scrutiny for five consecutive years of reporting gaps, the financial burden of ₹1,00,000 per year fell entirely on the directors, Mr. Goel and Mr. Pawan Chohan. This structure ensures that the company’s balance sheet remains unaffected by the penalty, as explicitly stated in the disclosure: "No compounding fee is payable by Luxury Time Limited." The rectification of these records in FY25 suggests a retrospective cleanup of compliance history, mitigating future regulatory risks related to historical data accuracy.
Disclosure Timeline Clarification
The company clarified that this disclosure follows an earlier intimation dated August 11, 2026, regarding an interim compounding order. The final order was received on September 25, 2026. Due to non-working days on September 26 and 27, 2026, the final disclosure was submitted on September 28, 2026. The company stated it would continue to adhere to applicable disclosure requirements under SEBI Listing Regulations.
Next Steps
Pursuant to the directions contained in the order, the company must file Form INC-28 with the jurisdictional Registrar of Companies. The company stated it would take necessary steps to comply with these directions within the applicable timeline. The intimation was made under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
Historical Stock Returns for Luxury Time
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +6.93% | +2.93% | +33.15% | +18.45% | -52.94% | -52.94% |
How will the rectification of consolidated financial statements for FY20-FY24 impact Luxury Time Limited's credit rating and borrowing costs in upcoming fiscal cycles?
Does the precedent of directors bearing the full compounding fee signal a shift in liability allocation for corporate governance defaults among other listed entities in the luxury sector?
What specific internal control enhancements is Luxury Time Limited implementing to ensure sustained compliance with Section 129 reporting requirements for its joint ventures?
18
Access Market Heat-map & Insights 
Create, Save & Share your Screener 
Use 200+ Screening Filters 
