Promoter confirms no encumbrance on shares in FY26
Sanghita Mukherjee, a promoter group member, disclosed holding 4,125 equity shares (0.03%) in Addictive Learning Technology with no encumbrance during FY26. The filing complies with SEBI Regulation 31(4) regarding takeover regulations.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Sanghita Mukherjee, a member of the promoter group at Addictive Learning Technology , has confirmed that no shares were encumbered during the financial year ended March 31, 2026. This disclosure ensures that the promoter's shareholding remains free from charges or liens, which is critical for shareholder transparency and regulatory compliance.
In a filing submitted to the National Stock Exchange (NSE), Mukherjee declared that she held 4,125 equity shares, representing 0.03% of the company's total equity, as on March 31, 2026. She further stated that neither she nor any persons acting in concert with her had made any encumbrance of shares, directly or indirectly, throughout FY26.
The declaration was made in compliance with Regulation 31(4) of the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeover) Regulations, 2011. This regulation mandates disclosures regarding any encumbrance on shares held by promoters to ensure the market is informed of potential risks related to pledged holdings.
The following table details the shareholding status disclosed:
| Shareholder | Shares Held | Percentage Holding | Encumbrance Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sanghita Mukherjee | 4,125 | 0.03% | None |
The filing was addressed to the Listing Compliance Department of NSE Limited for information and record purposes. The confirmation of zero encumbrance provides assurance to investors regarding the stability of the promoter's holding during the specified period.
Historical Stock Returns for Addictive Learning Technology
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -4.90% | -22.58% | -33.82% | -57.97% | -67.39% | -85.25% |
Does this zero-encumbrance status align with the broader promoter group's strategy to reduce leverage?
How might this clean holding impact investor confidence in the company's governance?
Are there plans for the promoter group to increase their stake in the near future?





























