Moneyboxx Finance Q1FY27 Results: GNPA drops to 0.73%, secured lending hits 87%
- Secured disbursements surged to 87% in Q1FY27, up from 25% in FY24
- GNPA dropped significantly to 0.73% from 3.59% in FY26
- Credit cost normalized to 1.02% in Q1FY27 from 3.32% in FY26
- Company targets AUM of ₹1,715 crore by FY28 with 36% CAGR
- Net interest margin contracted to 12.3% in Q1FY27 due to mix shift

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Moneyboxx Finance reported a significant structural shift in its loan book for the quarter ended August 2026, with 87% of disbursements now secured. This marks a decisive move away from the unsecured portfolio that characterized earlier periods, aiming to mitigate sector-wide stress and improve asset quality.
The NBFC targets an AUM CAGR of approximately 36% between FY26 and FY31, with a specific goal of reaching ₹1,715 crore in AUM by FY28. The company currently maintains a capital adequacy ratio (CRAR) of 28.7% for Q1FY27, providing a buffer for this planned expansion across four distinct lending engines: MSME secured loans, livestock finance, rooftop solar, and digital small-ticket lending.
Asset Quality Improvement
Asset quality metrics show marked improvement in Q1FY27 compared to FY26. The gross non-performing assets (GNPA) ratio fell sharply from 3.59% in FY26 to 0.73% in Q1FY27. Similarly, net NPAs declined from 1.75% to 0.36%.
The provision coverage ratio is implicitly strong given the drop in credit cost from 3.32% in FY26 to 1.02% in Q1FY27. Past due ratios also contracted, with 30+ days past due (PAR) falling from 8.40% to 6.34%, and 90+ days PAR dropping from 6.25% to 2.71%.
Portfolio Composition Shift
The composition of new originations has changed materially. In Q1FY27, approximately 70% of disbursements were above ₹5 lakh, up from just ~5% in FY24. Additionally, the share of borrowers with a bureau score of 650+ rose to 75%, compared to ~56% in FY24. This shift toward larger ticket sizes and higher-credit-score borrowers is intended to lift branch productivity and reduce cyclicality.
| Metric | FY24 | Q1FY27 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Secured disbursement share | 25% | 87% | +62 pps |
| Disbursements > ₹5 lakh | ~5% | ~70% | +65 pps |
| Bureau score 650+ share | ~56% | ~75% | +19 pps |
| GNPA | Data not available | 0.73% | - |
| Credit cost | Data not available | 1.02% | - |
Financial Performance and Margins
For FY26, the company reported total income of ₹232 crore, up from ₹199 crore in FY25. Net interest income and fees stood at ₹149 crore, while operating expenses were ₹116 crore. Operating profit reached ₹33 crore, but profit after tax was suppressed to ₹1 crore due to elevated credit costs of ₹31 crore during the year.
In Q1FY27, the average lending internal rate of return (IRR) was 24.5%, down from 26.0% in FY26, reflecting the mix shift toward lower-yielding secured assets. The average borrowing IRR remained stable at 12.5%, resulting in a net interest margin of 12.3%, compared to 13.9% in FY26.
Operating Leverage and Funding
Moneyboxx aims to drive operating leverage by reducing opex to average AUM from 12.8% in FY26 to approximately 8.8% by FY29. The company has diversified its funding base, with non-convertible debentures (NCDs) accounting for 40% of total borrowings in FY26, up from nil in FY22. The average cost of funds declined steadily from 16.1% in FY22 to 12.7% in FY26.
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between the decline in lending yield (from 26.0% to 24.5%) and the stability in borrowing costs (12.7% to 12.5%) indicates that the compression in net interest margin is driven entirely by asset-side mix changes rather than liability-side pressure. This suggests the company is prioritizing portfolio security over yield maximization in the near term, a strategy supported by the sharp reduction in credit costs from 3.32% to 1.02%.
Historical Stock Returns for Moneyboxx Finance
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0% | -35.08% | -39.15% | -46.12% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
How will the shift toward larger ticket sizes (>₹5 lakh) impact Moneyboxx's customer acquisition costs and branch productivity targets by FY29?
Given the compression in net interest margins to 12.3%, what specific operational efficiencies are required to achieve the target opex-to-AUM ratio of 8.8%?
What is the company's strategy for maintaining a 36% AUM CAGR while relying heavily on secured lending, which typically has longer processing times than unsecured digital loans?

































