Milkfood Q1 Results: Net profit turns positive at ₹22 lakh

2 min read     Updated on 07 Aug 2026, 03:58 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Naman SScanX News Team
AI Summary

Milkfood Limited returned to profitability in Q1FY27 with a net profit of ₹22 lakh, reversing a ₹69 lakh loss from the previous year. Revenue from operations increased 10.3% YoY to ₹8,122 lakh. Key disclosures include a ₹78 lakh claim against an insolvent entity and contingent liabilities of ₹4,579 lakh related to pending GST appeals.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
47644084

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Milkfood reported a net profit of ₹22 lakh for the quarter ended June 30, 2026, marking a return to profitability after posting a net loss of ₹69 lakh in the corresponding period of FY26. The company’s revenue from operations rose 10.3% year-on-year to ₹8,122 lakh, up from ₹7,366 lakh in Q1FY26. This turnaround is significant for shareholders as it indicates improved operational efficiency despite thin margins.

The Board of Directors approved the unaudited standalone financial results on August 7, 2026, pursuant to Regulation 30 and Regulation 33 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The results were reviewed by Madan & Associates, Chartered Accountants, the statutory auditors of the company, who issued an unmodified review report under Standard on Review Engagements (SRE) 2410.

Financial Performance

Total income for the quarter stood at ₹8,211 lakh, comprising ₹8,122 lakh from operations and ₹89 lakh from other income. In contrast, total income in Q4FY26 was ₹24,493 lakh, heavily influenced by ₹6,600 lakh in other income during that period. Total expenses were ₹8,159 lakh, including ₹7,674 lakh for cost of materials consumed and ₹478 lakh for employee benefits. Finance costs decreased to ₹225 lakh from ₹322 lakh in Q1FY26.

Particulars Q1FY27 (₹ Lakh) Q1FY26 (₹ Lakh) Change (%)
Revenue from Operations 8,122 7,366 10.3%
Other Income 89 555 -84.0%
Total Income 8,211 7,921 3.7%
Total Expenses 8,159 7,990 2.1%
Profit Before Tax 52 (69) Turnaround
Net Profit After Tax 22 (69) Turnaround

Key Disclosures and Risks

The auditor’s report included an emphasis of matter regarding several key items. Trade receivables include a claim of ₹78 lakh against an entity facing insolvency proceedings before the NCLT; the company has written off ₹22 lakh as a precautionary measure but expects recovery. Exceptional expenses of ₹23 lakh were recorded, representing share-based payment expenses treated as exceptional items under Ind AS 102.

Other income included a ₹80 lakh fair value gain on biological assets (trees and plantation), certified by management based on an agriculture scientist’s report. Additionally, the company capitalized ₹61 lakh in expenses towards capital work-in-progress for qualifying assets under Ind AS 23.

What the Numbers Show

The primary driver of the quarterly profit turnaround was not just top-line growth but a significant reduction in non-operational volatility. While revenue grew modestly by 10.3%, the absence of large one-time losses or high exceptional expenses allowed the company to retain its operating margin. However, the reliance on other income remains a variable factor; the drop in other income from ₹555 lakh in Q1FY26 to ₹89 lakh in Q1FY27 highlights the normalization of earnings. Contingent liabilities remain high at ₹4,579 lakh, primarily due to pending GST appeals involving demands of ₹1,896 lakh and interest receivable disputes, which pose potential future cash flow risks if not resolved favorably.

Historical Stock Returns for Milkfood

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
+5.66%+10.31%+5.77%+42.28%-4.48%-12.88%

How might the resolution of the ₹4,579 lakh in contingent liabilities, particularly the pending GST appeals, impact Milkfood's future cash flow stability and working capital?

Given the sharp 84% decline in other income, what specific operational strategies is Milkfood implementing to ensure sustainable profitability without relying on non-operational gains?

What is the timeline and likelihood of recovering the ₹78 lakh trade receivable from the entity facing NCLT insolvency proceedings, and how does this affect future provisioning?

Milkfood shareholders approve preferential convertible warrants issue

2 min read     Updated on 27 Jul 2026, 01:20 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Naman SScanX News Team
AI Summary

Milkfood Limited secured shareholder approval for issuing preferential convertible warrants to non-promoter/public investors. The special resolution passed with 17.58 million votes in favor (99.99%) against 239 votes against during the July 27, 2026 EGM, as confirmed by scrutinizer Kamlesh Gupta.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
46677026

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Milkfood Limited shareholders have approved a special resolution to issue convertible warrants on a preferential basis to non-promoter and public category investors. The resolution was passed with overwhelming support at the company’s 1st Extra-ordinary General Meeting (EGM) held on July 27, 2026, clearing the path for the dairy manufacturer to raise capital from external entities without immediate equity dilution.

The voting results, disclosed pursuant to Regulation 44(3) of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, show that 17,586,780 votes were cast in favor of the resolution, representing 99.9986% of the total valid votes polled. Only 239 votes were cast against the proposal. The high approval rate indicates strong shareholder confidence in the company’s capital structure strategy and its plan to attract investment through this instrument.

Voting Breakdown

The EGM saw participation from 10,617 shareholders as of the record date on July 20, 2026. The total shareholding stood at 25,596,180 shares. Voting was conducted through both remote e-voting and physical ballots at the venue.

Category Votes In Favor Votes Against % Support
Promoter and Promoter Group 13,660,096 0 100.00%
Public – Institutional Holders 0 0 N/A
Public – Others 3,926,684 239 99.99%
Total 17,586,780 239 99.9986%

Promoters held 13,660,096 shares and voted entirely in favor via e-voting. Among public shareholders, institutional holders did not participate in the voting process. Non-institutional public shareholders (Public-Others) held 11,936,084 shares, with 3,926,923 votes polled. Of these, 3,926,684 were in favor and 239 against, resulting in a 99.99% support rate within this segment.

Governance and Scrutiny

Ms. Kamlesh Gupta, a Practicing Company Secretary, was appointed as the scrutinizer for the EGM. Her consolidated report confirms that the voting process adhered to Section 108 of the Companies Act, 2013, Rule 20 of the Companies (Management and Administration) Rules, 2014, and SEBI Listing Regulations. Remote e-voting was facilitated by Central Depository Services (India) Limited (CDSL) and ran from July 24 to July 26, 2026. Physical ballot voting took place at the registered office in Bahadurgarh, Punjab, on July 27.

Mr. Harmesh Mohan Sood, Non-Executive Non-Independent Director, chaired the meeting. Other key attendees included Chairman Anil Girotra, Mrs. Preeti Mathur, Mrs. Namita Swain, and Company Secretary Rakesh Kumar Thakur. Statutory auditors represented by Mr. M K Madan were also present.

What This Means for Shareholders

The approval allows Milkfood Limited to proceed with the preferential allotment of convertible warrants. This mechanism enables the company to raise funds while deferring immediate dilution of existing equity stakes until the warrants are exercised. Investors should monitor future filings for details on the number of warrants issued, conversion prices, and specific allottees. The near-unanimous support suggests minimal resistance to this capital-raising approach among both promoter and public shareholders.

Historical Stock Returns for Milkfood

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
+5.66%+10.31%+5.77%+42.28%-4.48%-12.88%

What specific strategic initiatives or debt obligations will Milkfood Limited prioritize with the capital raised through these convertible warrants?

How might the eventual exercise of these warrants impact the promoter group's controlling stake and voting power in the long term?

Given the absence of institutional holder participation in the EGM, what factors may have influenced their decision to abstain from voting on this capital structure change?

More News on Milkfood

1 Year Returns:-4.48%