Mihika Industries revenue plunges 73% in Q1FY27 as trading volumes shrink
Mihika Industries reported a 72.7% YoY revenue decline to ₹45.27 lakh in Q1FY27, with net profit falling to ₹1.06 lakh. The drop stems from zero stock purchases compared to ₹380.08 lakh in Q1FY26. Statutory auditors S K Bhavsar & Co issued a clean review report on July 23, 2026.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Mihika Industries reported a significant contraction in business activity for the quarter ended June 30, 2026, with revenue from operations falling 72.7% year-on-year to ₹45.27 lakh. The agriculture product trader’s net profit for the period was ₹1.06 lakh, a decline from the ₹1.42 lakh recorded in Q1FY26. The steep drop in top-line figures reflects lower stock-in-trade purchases, which stood at nil for the current quarter compared to ₹380.08 lakh in the same period last year.
The unaudited financial results were reviewed by the Audit Committee and subsequently approved by the Board of Directors at their meeting held on July 23, 2026. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) notified under Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013, and Regulation 33 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. Statutory auditors S K Bhavsar & Co conducted a limited review report pursuant to Standard on Review Engagement (SRE) 2410 and found no material misstatement in the disclosed information.
Financial Performance Overview
The company’s total income decreased to ₹59.51 lakh from ₹181.51 lakh in Q1FY25, driven primarily by the collapse in operational revenue. Other income also saw a marginal decline to ₹14.24 lakh from ₹15.40 lakh in the preceding year. Total expenses were contained at ₹58.08 lakh, down significantly from ₹179.59 lakh in the previous year, largely due to the absence of stock purchases and changes in inventory valuation adjustments that previously impacted costs.
| Particulars | Q1FY27 (₹ in lacs) | Q4FY26 (₹ in lacs) | Q1FY26 (₹ in lacs) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from Operations | 45.27 | 44.69 | 166.11 |
| Other Income | 14.24 | 13.84 | 15.40 |
| Total Income | 59.51 | 58.53 | 181.51 |
| Total Expenses | 58.08 | 59.60 | 179.59 |
| Profit Before Tax | 1.43 | (1.07) | 1.91 |
| Tax Expenses | 0.37 | (2.52) | 0.50 |
| Net Profit | 1.06 | 1.45 | 1.42 |
Basic earnings per share remained flat at ₹0.01 for the quarter, unchanged from both the preceding quarter and the same period last year. The company incurred a current tax expense of ₹0.37 lakh, compared to ₹0.50 lakh in Q1FY26. There were no exceptional or extraordinary items reported during the period.
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between the drastic fall in revenue and the relatively stable net profit highlights the variable nature of Mihika Industries’ trading model. With purchases of stock-in-trade dropping to zero from ₹380.08 lakh in Q1FY26, the company appears to have operated with minimal inventory turnover in the current quarter. This suggests a pause in active trading cycles rather than a complete cessation of business, as evidenced by the continued generation of other income and minimal employee benefit expenses of ₹1.55 lakh. The lack of cost of materials consumed and depreciation expenses indicates that fixed overheads remain low, allowing the company to maintain profitability despite negligible operational volume.
Historical Stock Returns for Mihika Industries
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -5.00% | -13.69% | -13.40% | -0.62% | -35.21% | -36.98% |
What strategic factors led to the complete halt in stock-in-trade purchases for Q1FY27, and does this signal a temporary pause or a structural shift in Mihika Industries' trading model?
How sustainable is the current profitability given the reliance on minimal operational volume and low fixed overheads, especially if market conditions require increased inventory holding?
Will the company resume active trading cycles in Q2FY27, and what indicators should investors watch to confirm a return to normal revenue levels?


































