Keerthi Industries AGM passes all resolutions with 99.99% assent
- All three AGM resolutions passed with 99.99% votes in favor
- Promoter group voted unanimously; public non-institutions cast 14 dissenting votes
- Venkata Krishna Jasti re-appointed as Director following retirement by rotation
- Financial statements for FY26 and cost auditor remuneration for FY27 ratified

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Keerthi Industries Limited concluded its 43rd Annual General Meeting (AGM) on September 24, 2026, passing all three proposed resolutions with overwhelming shareholder support. The meeting, conducted via video conferencing to comply with regulatory norms, saw 99.99% of votes polled in favor of the agenda items.
The company disclosed that voting results and the scrutinizer's report were published on its website and on CDSL's e-voting platform on September 25, 2026. The meeting commenced at 11:00 am and ended at 11:50 am, with fifty-nine members participating in the virtual session.
Board attendance and management presence
Key managerial personnel and directors attended the meeting to address shareholder queries. The Managing Director responded to questions raised by members during the session.
| Name | Designation |
|---|---|
| Triveni Jasti | Chairperson & Whole Time Director |
| Seshagiri Rao Jasti | Managing Director |
| Sivaram Prasad Jetty | Independent Director |
| Seetha Ramanjaneyulu Thagirisa | Independent Director |
| Krishna Prasad Gondi | Independent Director |
| Venkata Krishna Jasti | Non-Executive Director |
| P.V. Subba Rao | Chief Financial Officer |
| Anupama Iyer | Company Secretary and Compliance Officer |
Independent Director Ramakrishna Prasad Musunuri was absent due to prior commitments. Statutory auditors from Brahmayya & Co., secretarial auditors from VCSR & Associates, cost auditors from Vasireddy & Associates, and internal auditors from Pavuluri & Co. were present as invitees.
Resolution outcomes
The scrutinizer's report confirmed that all ordinary resolutions were passed with requisite majority. The promoter group voted unanimously in favor of all items, while public non-institutional shareholders recorded a dissenting vote of 14 shares against each resolution.
| Resolution | Description | Votes in Favour | Votes Against | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adoption of audited financial statements for FY26 | 57,74,529 | 14 | Passed |
| 2 | Re-appointment of Venkata Krishna Jasti as Director | 57,74,529 | 14 | Passed |
| 3 | Ratification of cost auditor remuneration for FY27 | 57,74,529 | 14 | Passed |
Meeting proceedings and voting mechanism
Company Secretary Anupama Iyer briefed shareholders on the general instructions for participation and the e-voting procedure. She confirmed that the annual report and notice convening the AGM had been mailed to all members. Shareholders utilized the electronic voting facility provided by CDSL to cast their votes during the meeting.
The Chairperson highlighted the company's performance for the financial year ended March 31, 2026. She also briefed members on business activities and the future outlook. Since all resolutions were put to vote electronically, separate proposals for each resolution were not required.
Disclosure compliance
The company filed this disclosure under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The proceedings were held in compliance with the Companies Act, 2013, and relevant circulars issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.
Historical Stock Returns for Keerthi Industries
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -8.33% | 0.0% | -9.32% | -23.41% | -42.40% | 0.0% |
How will the ratification of the cost auditor's remuneration for FY27 impact Keerthi Industries' operational cost structure in the upcoming fiscal year?
What specific strategic initiatives did the Chairperson highlight regarding the future outlook that could drive growth beyond the FY26 performance?
Given the overwhelming promoter support and minimal dissent, how might this governance structure influence the company's ability to attract new institutional investors?


































