iCodex Publishing Solutions has confirmed its eighth Annual General Meeting is scheduled for September 30, 2026. The company published the notice in newspapers on September 8, 2026, marking a procedural step ahead of the shareholder vote.

The AGM will be conducted via Video Conferencing or Other Audio-Visual Means. This format complies with applicable provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and SEBI Listing Regulations.

Name Change Proposal

The board previously approved changing the company name from "iCodex Publishing Solutions Limited" to "iCodex Limited". This move requires consequential amendments to the Memorandum of Association. The proposal is subject to shareholder approval via a Special Resolution and other statutory clearances. The Company Registrar confirmed the reservation of the new name on September 2, 2026.

Key Management Appointments

Ms. Kajal Patil was appointed as Chief Financial Officer effective September 4, 2026. She holds an MBA in Finance and a Bachelor of Commerce degree. Her experience covers financial management, budgeting, forecasting, GST compliance, and bank vendor reconciliation.

Mr. Vishnu Prasad was recommended for appointment as an Independent Director for a five-year term. He currently serves as an Additional Independent Director since May 15, 2026. The appointment requires shareholder approval. Mr. Prasad is an alumnus of IIM Calcutta and NLSIU Bangalore with over 30 years of experience in IT, LegalTech, and publishing sectors.

Other Board Decisions

The board recommended the re-appointment of Mr. Chetan Shankarlal Soni as Whole-Time Director. He retires by rotation and has offered himself for re-appointment. The directors also approved the Notice for the eighth Annual General Meeting scheduled for September 30, 2026.

CS Kuldeep Ruchandani was appointed as the Scrutinizer for the e-voting process during the AGM. The board meeting commenced at 3:30 pm and concluded at 4:45 pm.

Icodex Publishing Solutions shareholders have approved two special resolutions seeking to modify the terms and timeline for the utilization of its Initial Public Offering (IPO) proceeds. The voting results were declared based on a postal ballot held through a remote e-voting system, with the final date for receipt of votes being August 14, 2026.

The company disclosed the results under Regulation 44 and Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The resolutions aimed to address variations in the objects or terms of utilization of the IPO proceeds and to ratify any deviations in the utilization of these funds towards the stated objects of the offer. The remote e-voting process began on July 17, 2026, at 9:00 am and concluded on August 14, 2026, at 5:00 pm.

Voting Breakdown

The resolutions required a special majority for passage. The total number of shareholders on the record date of July 10, 2026, was 921. A total of 11,638,478 votes were polled, representing 74.43% of the outstanding shares.

Promoter and promoter group shareholders, holding 10,076,100 shares, cast all their polled votes (10,003,647) in favor of both resolutions. Among public non-institutional shareholders, who held 5,560,920 shares, 1,634,831 votes were polled. Of these, 1,612,831 votes supported the resolutions, while 22,000 votes were cast against them. No institutional investors participated in the voting process.

Scrutinizer’s Report

Kuldeep Dayaldas Ruchandani of KPRC & Associates served as the independent scrutinizer for the postal ballot. The scrutinizer appointed on July 10, 2026, issued the report on August 14, 2026, confirming that the resolutions were duly passed by the members of the company. No invalid votes were recorded across any shareholder category.

What the Numbers Show

The voting pattern reveals a distinct divergence between promoter and public non-institutional shareholders regarding the deviation in IPO fund usage. While promoters provided unanimous support, approximately 1.35% of the polled votes from public non-institutional shareholders opposed the resolution. This indicates a minority dissent among retail and non-institutional public investors concerning the modification of IPO proceeds utilization terms, despite the overall resolution passing with nearly universal support.