Hoffman questions SpaceX AI strategy, calls it 'premium-priced CoreWeave'
Reid Hoffman criticized Space Exploration Technologies Corp.'s AI strategy and xAI's performance on the Pioneers of AI podcast, calling SpaceX a 'premium-priced CoreWeave' and noting xAI's founder departures. Despite SpaceX losing $1 trillion in a week, it raised $20 billion in debt. Hoffman also expressed confidence in both OpenAI and Anthropic, while leaked financials showed OpenAI's net loss widened to $39 billion in 2025.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Reid Hoffman, co-founder of LinkedIn, criticized the artificial intelligence strategy of Space Exploration Technologies Corp. and the performance of xAI during a recent appearance on the Pioneers of AI podcast. Hoffman argued that SpaceX is not an AI company and suggested its recent acquisition of Cursor was an attempt to use its market capitalization to buy its way into relevance rather than demonstrating inherent capability. He characterized the company as a "premium-priced CoreWeave," referencing the cloud infrastructure provider.
Hoffman detailed significant challenges facing xAI, noting that all of its founders have departed and the company is on its "third restart." He described xAI's efforts to build foundational models as a "complete train wreck," a characterization he attributed to Elon Musk himself. These comments follow SpaceX's public listing on June 12, where AI featured prominently in its IPO narrative, and the subsequent announcement of the Cursor acquisition.
SpaceX has recently experienced extreme volatility, reportedly losing $1 trillion in market value in a single week. Despite this equity decline, the company successfully raised $20 billion in debt, indicating a divergence in sentiment between equity and credit investors. The stock has also drawn comparisons to meme stocks, with CNBC's Jim Cramer likening it to GameStop Corp.
AI Market Outlook
Despite his critique of SpaceX, Hoffman expressed optimism about the broader AI sector. He dismissed the idea that OpenAI and Anthropic are direct rivals, arguing the market is large enough for both to achieve substantial success. "There’s a lot of room for both of them to win incredibly," Hoffman stated. He also voiced concern over the U.S. government's decision to compel Anthropic to withdraw its Fable and Mythos models, criticizing the lack of a clear rationale behind the move.
Hoffman's comments come as he transitions away from corporate board roles to focus on his startup, Manus. He recently left Microsoft Corporation's board after nearly a decade and departed from OpenAI's board in 2023 to avoid conflicts of interest with his investments through Greylock Partners.
OpenAI Financials
Separately, OpenAI's confidential IPO filing has revealed significant financial losses. The company's net loss reportedly widened to about $39 billion in 2025 from $5 billion in 2024. However, its adjusted loss, excluding restructuring and other non-cash charges, was $8 billion. The company spent roughly $34 billion during the year, allocating $19 billion to research and development and nearly $6 billion to sales and marketing.
| Metric | Figure |
|---|---|
| Net Loss 2025 | $39 billion |
| Net Loss 2024 | $5 billion |
| Adjusted Loss 2025 | $8 billion |
| Total Spend 2025 | $34 billion |
| R&D Spend 2025 | $19 billion |
| Sales & Marketing 2025 | $6 billion |
Will the departure of all founding members and reported internal instability force xAI to seek a buyer or strategic partner to survive?
Can OpenAI sustain its $34 billion annual burn rate and mounting losses without exhausting its cash reserves before achieving profitability?
How will the U.S. government's lack of clear rationale for compelling Anthropic to withdraw models impact future regulatory decisions in the AI sector?
































