SpaceX excluded from ESG funds after lowest MSCI rating
Space Exploration Technologies Corp was assigned a CCC ESG rating by MSCI on June 11 due to governance risks and controversies, preventing its inclusion in ESG funds. While nearly 100 ETFs hold the stock, major ESG funds like the iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF exclude it. The situation highlights the dilemma for ESG investors as the sector faces declining interest and fund closures.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Space Exploration Technologies Corp has become a holding in roughly 100 exchange-traded funds, yet it remains absent from ESG portfolios following a severe assessment from MSCI. The research firm assigned SpaceX its lowest possible ESG rating of CCC on June 11, citing significant governance risks and severe controversies. This rating effectively disqualifies the stock from inclusion in many ESG funds, which typically screen out companies with bottom-tier governance scores or low overall ratings.
The exclusion creates a sharp contrast between mainstream ETF strategies and ESG mandates. While SpaceX has quickly integrated into space, innovation, growth, and broad-market ETFs, ESG funds have stayed on the sidelines. Major ESG funds such as the iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF, iShares ESG MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF, and iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF do not hold the stock. These funds rely on MSCI or Sustainalytics methodologies that limit exposure to companies with severe controversies or weak governance practices.
Governance Risks Drive Low Rating
MSCI's assessment focused heavily on governance factors, including corporate oversight, shareholder rights, disclosure standards, and insider control. The firm also assigned an "orange flag" controversy designation to SpaceX. Governance has historically been viewed as the ESG factor most closely linked to financial outcomes, making the rating a significant barrier for ESG managers.
The situation presents a dilemma for ESG investors. By excluding a stock that has rapidly become a market favorite, ESG funds risk lagging benchmarks if SpaceX's growth trajectory continues. However, proponents argue that the screening process identifies risks the broader market may overlook, potentially validating the strategy if governance issues materialize later.
ESG Investing Faces Headwinds
The exclusion comes as ESG investing faces broader challenges. Bloomberg Intelligence ETF analyst Eric Balchunas noted that ESG has largely vanished from industry discussions, citing more than 125 ESG ETF closures in recent years. Many funds are dropping ESG terminology from their names as investor demand fades. Critics argue that ESG screens force investors to miss out on high-growth opportunities, a point underscored by SpaceX's surge since its public debut.
For now, the market remains split. Nearly 100 ETFs own SpaceX, but none carry an ESG mandate. The divergence underscores the ongoing debate over whether governance screens add value or simply exclude high-performing assets.
Could SpaceX implement governance reforms to secure an upgrade from MSCI, or is the CCC rating likely to persist?
Will the continued exclusion of SpaceX accelerate the trend of investors shifting capital from dedicated ESG funds to broad-market ETFs?
How might the performance gap between ESG funds and non-ESG benchmarks evolve if SpaceX maintains its rapid growth trajectory?
































