Himalaya Nutravedics faces ₹2 crore trademark infringement suit
- Himalaya Global Holdings and Wellness Company filed a commercial suit against Himalaya Nutravedics India Limited for trademark infringement.
- The plaintiffs seek damages of ₹2,00,01,000 and a direction to change the company's corporate name to remove 'HIMALAYA'.
- The suit alleges the use of 'HIMALAYA NUTRAVEDICS' causes consumer confusion and dilutes the registered trade mark.
- A previous suit filed in the Delhi High Court was returned with liberty to file in the appropriate forum, leading to this Bengaluru filing.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Himalaya Nutravedics India Limited disclosed that Himalaya Global Holdings Ltd. and M/s. Himalaya Wellness Company have filed a commercial suit against it, alleging trademark infringement and seeking damages of ₹2,00,01,000.
The plaintiffs also sought a direction for the company to change its corporate name to remove the word "HIMALAYA" and an injunction restraining the use of the mark "HIMALAYA NUTRAVEDICS". The suit was filed before the Hon'ble Additional District and Sessions Judge (Dedicated Commercial Court), Bengaluru Rural.
Nature of Allegations and Reliefs Sought
The plaintiffs allege that the company's use of the mark "HIMALAYA NUTRAVEDICS" on its goods and the word "HIMALAYA" in its corporate name infringes their registered trade mark. They claim the company operates in the pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and Ayurvedic segment, overlapping with their business, and that this adoption is dishonest and causes consumer confusion.
The specific reliefs sought by the plaintiffs include:
- Permanent injunctions restraining the company from dealing in goods or services under the mark "HIMALAYA NUTRAVEDICS" or any deceptively similar mark.
- A direction to apply to the Registrar of Companies for a change of corporate name to remove the word "HIMALAYA".
- Damages valued at ₹2,00,01,000 together with costs.
- Delivery up for erasure or destruction of goods and material bearing the impugned mark.
- Rendition of accounts of profits from June 16, 2022, till the disposal of the suit.
Procedural History and Current Status
The company received intimation of the filing via email from the plaintiffs' advocates on October 3, 2026. The suit was e-filed on October 2, 2026, and physically filed on October 3, 2026, assigned Filing/Registration No. F.R. No. 437 of 2026. It is likely to be listed before the court on October 5, 2026.
This litigation follows a previous suit instituted by the same plaintiffs before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi (CS(COMM) No. 1061/2026). By order dated September 28, 2026, the High Court ordered the return of the plaint with liberty to present it before the appropriate forum, leading to the current filing in Bengaluru.
Litigation Details
| Particulars | Details |
|---|---|
| Plaintiffs | Himalaya Global Holdings Ltd.; M/s. Himalaya Wellness Company |
| Court | Hon'ble Additional District and Sessions Judge (Dedicated Commercial Court), Bengaluru Rural |
| Claim Amount | ₹2,00,01,000 (plus unquantified rendition of accounts) |
| Key Relief | Change of corporate name; injunction on trademark use |
| Status | No order passed; no summons served as of disclosure date |
What the Numbers Show
The financial implications are currently unquantified beyond the stated damages claim of ₹2,00,01,000. However, the demand for rendition of accounts from June 16, 2022, introduces a variable liability dependent on the company's profit generation during that period. The company denies the allegations and states it will contest the suit, noting that no order has been passed against it as of the disclosure date.
Historical Stock Returns for Himalaya Nutravedics
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +4.97% | +15.66% | +15.66% | +15.66% | +15.66% | +15.66% |
How might the demand for rendition of accounts since June 2022 impact Himalaya Nutravedics' balance sheet if the court rules in favor of the plaintiffs?
What are the potential operational disruptions and rebranding costs for Himalaya Nutravedics if a mandatory name change is enforced?
Could this litigation trigger similar trademark enforcement actions against other entities using 'Himalaya' in their corporate names within the Ayurvedic sector?


























