HCL Infosystems faces ₹80.22 lakh CGST penalty from Noida appeals

scanx
Reviewed by
Jubin VScanX News Team
Key Highlights
  • HCL Infosystems received a ₹80.22 lakh penalty from Noida CGST Appeals
  • Penalty imposed under Section 74(1) of CGST Act, 2017
  • Order modifies earlier decision that had dropped interest and penalty
  • Dispute relates to CENVAT credit availed in pre-GST regime
powered bylight_fuzz_icon
51895019

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

HCL Infosystems has received a penalty of ₹80.22 lakhs from the Additional Commissioner, CGST (Appeals), Noida. The order, dated September 15, 2026, was received by the company on September 24, 2026.

The penalty arises from a dispute over CENVAT credit availed for various cesses in the pre-GST regime. The adjudicating authority initially confirmed a tax demand of ₹80.22 lakhs under Section 74(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, but dropped proposals relating to interest and penalty in its original order dated February 1, 2025.

Appeal Outcome

The Department preferred an appeal against the original order, challenging the dropping of interest and penalty. The Additional Commissioner partially allowed this appeal, modifying the original order to impose the penalty amount on the company.

The core issue involved was the applicability of interest and penalty on the confirmed tax demand. While the tax liability itself remained unchanged from the original assessment, the appellate authority reversed the earlier relief granted regarding penalties.

Company Response

HCL Infosystems stated it is evaluating the Order-in-Appeal and considering available legal remedies in accordance with law. The company filed the intimation with BSE and NSE under Regulation 30 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.

Litigation Details

Particulars Details
Opposing Party Assistant Commissioner, Central GST, Division-I Noida
Respondent HCL Infosystems Limited
Authority Additional Commissioner, CGST (Appeals), Noida
Issue Involved Applicability of interest and penalty on tax demand
Penalty Imposed ₹80.22 lakhs under Section 74(1) of CGST Act, 2017

The company referenced previous disclosures filed on February 5, 2025, and June 4, 2025, regarding the original order and its rectification. The current development marks a shift in the financial implication of the litigation, moving from a tax-only demand to one inclusive of significant penalties.

Historical Stock Returns for HCL Infosystems

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
+1.44%+4.86%-2.76%-1.95%-30.69%-22.85%
Disclaimer: This article is AI-generated using data from LiveSquawk. ScanX is not liable for any inaccuracies.

Will HCL Infosystems pursue further legal remedies such as a writ petition or High Court appeal to challenge the penalty imposition?

How might this appellate reversal influence the broader tax litigation strategy of other HCL Group entities facing similar pre-GST CENVAT credit disputes?

What are the potential implications for HCL Infosystems' financial provisioning and quarterly earnings if the penalty is not stayed by higher courts?

HCL Infosystems shareholders approve all AGM resolutions with promoter backing

scanx
Reviewed by
Suketu GScanX News Team
Key Highlights
  • All five resolutions at the 40th AGM were passed with promoter backing
  • Promoters voted 100% in favour on all items; public institutions did not vote
  • Public shareholders showed 13.61% dissent on director re-appointment
  • Related-party transaction with HCL Capital faced 13.25% opposition from public
  • Statutory and secretarial audit reports for FY26 had no qualifications
powered bylight_fuzz_icon
51111809

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

HCL Infosystems shareholders approved all five resolutions at its 40th annual general meeting held on September 16, 2026. The meeting was conducted via video conferencing from 10:30 am to 11:40 am, with 138 members attending via VC and satisfying quorum requirements.

A total of 192,270 shareholders were on record as of September 9, 2026. Voting was conducted through remote e-voting and during the meeting, scrutinized by CS Vineet K Chaudhary of VKC & Associates. National Securities Depository Limited (NSDL) facilitated the e-voting process.

Key Resolutions Passed

Shareholders approved ordinary and special business items including audited financial statements, director re-appointments, manager remuneration, and related-party transactions.

Agenda Item Resolution Type Status
Adoption of Audited Financial Statements Ordinary Passed
Re-appointment of Mr. Pawan Kumar Danwar as Non-Executive Director Ordinary Passed
Approval of remuneration for Mr. Gaurav Bhalla (Manager) Special Passed
Related-party transaction with HCL Capital Private Limited Ordinary Passed
Related-party transaction with HCL Corporation Private Limited Ordinary Passed

Voting Results Breakdown

Promoter group shareholders, holding 207,031,161 shares, voted 100% in favour on all resolutions where they participated. Public institutional shareholders did not cast votes on any resolution. Non-institutional public shareholders participated actively, showing varying levels of support across resolutions.

Resolution Total Votes Polled Votes In Favour % In Favour Votes Against % Against
Audited Financial Statements 207,266,672 207,262,308 99.9979% 4,364 0.0021%
Re-appointment of Pawan Kumar Danwar 207,265,422 207,233,534 99.9846% 31,888 0.0154%
Remuneration of Gaurav Bhalla 207,265,422 207,233,934 99.9848% 31,488 0.0152%
Related-party transaction (HCL Capital) 234,261 203,233 86.7549% 31,028 13.2451%
Related-party transaction (HCL Corp) 234,511 228,514 97.4428% 5,997 2.5572%

Audit and Governance Updates

Dr. Nikhil Sinha, Chairman of the Board, informed members that the statutory auditor’s report and secretarial auditor’s report for the financial year ended March 31, 2026, contained no qualifications or adverse remarks. Consequently, these reports were not read out in full during the meeting.

Mr. Pawan Kumar Danwar was re-appointed as a Non-Executive, Non-Independent Director liable to retire by rotation. The company also secured approval for entering material related-party transactions with promoter group companies HCL Capital Private Limited and HCL Corporation Private Limited.

What the Numbers Show

The voting pattern reveals a clear divergence between promoter and public shareholder sentiment. While promoters provided unanimous backing for all resolutions, non-institutional public shareholders expressed notable dissent on governance matters. Specifically, 13.61% of public votes polled opposed the re-appointment of Mr. Pawan Kumar Danwar, and 13.25% opposed the related-party transaction with HCL Capital Private Limited. This suggests active scrutiny by retail investors on director appointments and related-party dealings, even though the promoter bloc ensured passage of all resolutions.

Historical Stock Returns for HCL Infosystems

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
+1.44%+4.86%-2.76%-1.95%-30.69%-22.85%

How might the 13% dissent from public shareholders on the HCL Capital related-party transaction influence future governance disclosures or deal structures?

What strategic rationale is driving HCL Infosystems to pursue material transactions with promoter entities HCL Capital and HCL Corporation?

Could the active scrutiny by retail investors signal a broader shift in shareholder activism regarding director re-appointments at HCL Infosystems?

More News on HCL Infosystems

1 Year Returns:-30.69%