Gulshan Polyols files FY26 BRSR: Ethanol drives 59% of turnover
Gulshan Polyols Limited filed its FY26 BRSR, revealing ethanol as the primary revenue source at 59.13%. Exports contributed 5.049% to turnover. The company reported 1,333 employees and workers, with one worker fatality. Environmental data shows high renewable energy usage and increased water withdrawal.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Gulshan Polyols Limited submitted its Business Responsibility and Sustainability Report (BRSR) for the financial year ended March 31, 2026, pursuant to Regulation 34(2)(f) of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The filing provides a detailed breakdown of the company’s operational footprint, revenue composition, and sustainability metrics for FY26.
Revenue Composition
Ethanol remains the dominant revenue driver for the company, contributing 59.13% to total turnover in FY26. Sorbitol followed as the second-largest segment with 14.71%, while by-products accounted for 11.10%. Fructose and sweeteners contributed 4.51%, liquor/country liquor 3.86%, and starch 3.13%.
Exports constituted 5.049% of the total turnover during the year. The company serves customers across multiple industries, including dentifrice, personal care, food, paper, pharma, footwear, plastics, printing, paint, oil marketing companies, animal feed, rubber, and automobiles.
Workforce and Safety
As of March 31, 2026, the company employed 368 permanent employees and 965 workers (comprising 209 permanent and 756 non-permanent workers). Women represented 7.33% of permanent employees but held 40% of Board seats and 50% of Key Management Personnel positions.
The company recorded one fatality among workers in FY26, matching the figure from FY25. The Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR) remained at zero for both employees and workers. No recordable work-related injuries were reported for employees, while workers had zero recordable injuries in FY26 compared to one in FY25.
Environmental Metrics
Total energy consumption from renewable sources stood at 13,74,67,641.36 J, while non-renewable sources contributed 1,39,59,788.40 J. Total water withdrawal increased to 34,05,008 kilolitres from 23,14,777 kilolitres in the prior year, driven by a rise in third-party water usage. Water consumption was 12,53,689 kilolitres.
Greenhouse gas emissions included 26,574.29 metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent for Scope 1 and 25,926.24 metric tonnes for Scope 2. Total waste generated was 52,358.66 metric tonnes, primarily comprising non-hazardous waste.
Governance and Compliance
The company disclosed monetary penalties totaling approximately ₹11.99 lakh during FY26. These included a GST penalty of ₹7,05,778 related to HSN classification disputes, a ₹20,000 penalty for wrongly taken ITC, a ₹4,00,000 fine from the Central Ground Water Authority for non-compliance with water metering norms, and a ₹93,144 income tax penalty for revenue discrepancies. No appeals were preferred against these orders.
CSR spending was applicable under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013, given the company’s turnover of ₹23,12,42,17,684 and net worth of ₹8,88,09,94,002. The company closed its foreign subsidiary, Gulshan Overseas – FZCO, in Dubai, which was legally dissolved on October 17, 2025.
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between renewable (~13.7 billion J) and non-renewable (~140 million J) energy consumption highlights a significant shift toward sustainable power sources, with renewables accounting for over 99% of total energy intake. Additionally, the rise in water withdrawal (+47% YoY) contrasts with stable production volumes, suggesting increased reliance on third-party water supplies rather than groundwater extraction alone.
Historical Stock Returns for Gulshan Polyols
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.24% | -6.69% | +6.24% | +20.28% | +12.42% | -8.82% |
How might the 47% year-over-year increase in water withdrawal impact Gulshan Polyols' operational costs and sustainability ratings in the coming fiscal years?
What strategic implications does the closure of the Dubai subsidiary have on the company's export growth trajectory, given that exports currently constitute only 5% of turnover?
Will the recent regulatory penalties, particularly the Central Ground Water Authority fine for non-compliance with metering norms, trigger stricter internal governance audits or affect future compliance standing?


































