Gulshan Polyols receives ₹146.66 crore LNTP from OMCs for ethanol supply
Gulshan Polyols received an LNTP valued at ₹146.65606 crore from Oil Marketing Companies for an additional allocation of 20,740 kiloliters of ethanol for Q4 of ESY 2025-26, covering Assam and Madhya Pradesh. The total disclosed order book stands at ₹244.62 crore, providing coverage for 0.43 quarters of average quarterly revenue. Annual revenue grew 45.6% YoY from ₹1,390.20 crore in FY24 to ₹2,024.50 crore in FY25, while OPM improved from 5.61% in Q4FY25 to 7.73% in Q2FY26.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Gulshan Polyols has received a Limited Notice to Proceed (LNTP) valued at ₹146.65606 crore from Oil Marketing Companies (OMCs) for an additional allocation of 20,740 kiloliters of ethanol. The supply covers the states of Assam and Madhya Pradesh and is scheduled for Q4 of the Ethanol Supply Year (ESY) 2025-26, with the disclosure made on August 17, 2026. As an LNTP, this represents a pre-qualification or mobilisation step rather than a fully executed contract; revenue recognition begins only after formal work order issuance by the OMCs.
Order in financial context
The ₹146.65606 crore LNTP value represents approximately 25.9% of the company's average quarterly revenue of ₹565.83 crore. The total disclosed order book, summing the last three fiscal quarters, stands at ₹244.62 crore across 4 orders. This backlog provides coverage for only 0.43 quarters of average quarterly revenue, indicating a lean pipeline relative to the scale of operations. As a TYPE B filing, the ₹146.65606 crore figure represents advance engineering costs or mobilisation value; the full contract value will be recognised only upon formal work order issuance.
Company order track record
Order inflow has accelerated in the most recent quarter compared to the prior period. In Q2FY27, the company recorded ₹207.20 crore in inflows driven by domestic excise contracts, whereas Q1FY27 saw ₹37.42 crore from ethanol allocations. The current LNTP value is consistent with the magnitude of previous ethanol-related allocations, suggesting sustained demand from OMCs.
| Quarter: | Total order inflow (₹ crore): | Key awarding entities: |
|---|---|---|
| Q2FY27 (Jul-Sep 2026) | 207.20 | Excise Department, Madhya Pradesh |
| Q1FY27 (Apr-Jun 2026) | 37.42 | Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) |
Execution and revenue quality
Consolidated revenue has remained robust, ranging between ₹515.70 crore and ₹595.10 crore over the last three quarters. Operating Profit Margin (OPM) has shown improvement, rising from 5.61% in Q4FY25 to 7.73% in Q2FY26. Net profit followed a similar upward trajectory, reaching ₹15.80 crore in the latest quarter. There are no quarters with net losses or negative OPM in this period, signaling stable execution on existing contracts.
| Quarter: | Revenue (₹ crore): | Net profit (₹ crore): | OPM (%): |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q2FY26 | 542.00 | 15.80 | 7.73% |
| Q1FY26 | 595.10 | 13.10 | 6.16% |
| Q4FY25 | 515.70 | 7.00 | 5.61% |
Revenue growth
As Gulshan Polyols has accelerated order wins, with inflow increasing from ₹37.42 crore in Q1FY27 to ₹207.20 crore in Q2FY27, its annual revenue has grown from ₹1,390.20 crore in FY24 to ₹2,024.50 crore in FY25, representing a YoY growth of 45.6% based on the latest annual data.
Working capital and execution capacity
The balance sheet shows a current ratio of 1.14x, which is below the comfortable threshold of 1.2x, indicating tight liquidity headroom for funding new working capital requirements. Total Liabilities/Equity stands at 1.16x, reflecting moderate leverage that includes trade payables and other non-debt liabilities. Operating cashflow was positive at ₹41.70 crore in FY25, but free cashflow remained negative at -₹14.60 crore due to capex outflows of ₹56.30 crore.
What to watch
- Formal work order issuance: Revenue recognition for the ₹146.65606 crore ethanol allocation will begin only after the OMCs issue the final Letter of Award (LOA) or work order.
- Execution rate: Monitor quarterly revenue run-rate against the total backlog of ₹244.62 crore to assess if new orders are being executed promptly.
- OPM trajectory: Watch if the margin quality on these new ethanol supplies matches the improving OPM trend seen in recent quarters (currently 7.73%).
- Client concentration: A significant portion of the disclosed order book comes from OMCs and state excise departments; any delay in payments from these large entities could impact cash flows.
Key observations
- Contract structure: This is a mobilisation/LNTP order. Revenue recognition begins only after formal work order issuance. The ₹146.65606 crore represents advance engineering costs, not the full contract value.
- Valuation check (as of August 17, 2026): P/E of 8.0x against ROCE of 7.64%. Valuation was pricing in execution improvement not yet visible in return ratios. (P/E is price-derived and will change; ROCE is from audited financials)
- Leverage flag: Total Liabilities/Equity of 1.16x; balance sheet carries elevated liabilities, and ability to fund working capital for the existing backlog should be monitored given the current ratio of 1.14x.
- Cash conversion: Operating cashflow of ₹41.70 crore in FY25; however, free cashflow was negative at -₹14.60 crore, indicating capex intensity remains high relative to operating cash generation.
Historical Stock Returns for Gulshan Polyols
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.52% | -5.04% | +8.11% | +22.40% | +14.40% | -7.22% |
How will the conversion of the ₹146.65 crore LNTP into formal work orders impact Gulshan Polyols' revenue recognition timeline and Q4 FY27 earnings visibility?
Given the current ratio of 1.14x, what specific financing strategies will the company employ to fund the working capital requirements for this new ethanol allocation without increasing leverage?
Will the margin profile of this new ethanol supply contract align with the recent OPM improvement trend of 7.73%, or could competitive pricing pressures from OMCs compress margins?


































