GST Department visits Reliable Data Services, issues summon
Reliable Data Services Limited reported a visit by GST Department officials on May 19, 2026, regarding GST compliance, followed by the issuance of a summon. The company affirmed its compliance and provision of necessary documents.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Reliable Data Services Limited announced that officials from the GST Department, Preventive Cell, visited its office on May 19, 2026. The purpose of the visit was to conduct an enquiry related to the company's compliance with Goods and Services Tax (GST) regulations. Following the visit, the GST Department issued a summon to the company on the same day.
The company confirmed that it has fully cooperated with the authorities during the process. In its disclosure, reliable data services stated that it has complied with all requirements and furnished the necessary documents requested by the officials.
Key Details of the Disclosure
The following table summarizes the key events disclosed by the company:
| Date | Event | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2026 | GST Department Visit | GST Department, Preventive Cell |
| May 19, 2026 | Summon Issued | GST Department |
The intimation was made to the stock exchanges pursuant to Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The disclosure was filed under Schedule III, Part-A, Para A (Clause 19) of the regulations.
Historical Stock Returns for Reliable Data Services
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0.49% | -0.05% | -2.10% | +0.59% | +70.74% | +368.68% |
Could the GST Department's investigation lead to financial penalties or back-tax demands that may materially impact Reliable Data Services Limited's earnings and cash flow?
How might prolonged GST scrutiny affect investor confidence and the company's stock performance in the near term?
Is this GST inquiry part of a broader sectoral crackdown on IT or data services companies, and could peers in the industry face similar regulatory actions?


































