Gilead and Merck end lung cancer trial, report HIV success
Gilead Sciences Inc. and Merck & Co. Inc. halted a Phase 3 lung cancer trial for Trodelvy plus Keytruda due to insufficient statistical benefit. In contrast, their once-weekly oral HIV regimen showed positive Phase 3 results, meeting primary endpoints in two studies. The companies intend to seek regulatory approval for the HIV treatment.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Gilead Sciences Inc. and Merck & Co. Inc. discontinued the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-D46/EVOKE-03 trial evaluating the combination of Trodelvy and Keytruda for previously untreated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with high PD-L1 expression. The decision followed a review by a Data Monitoring Committee of progression-free survival and interim overall survival data. While the combination showed a numerical improvement in progression-free survival, it did not reach statistical significance, and investigators determined the probability of achieving a meaningful overall survival benefit at final analysis was low. The safety profile remained consistent with known profiles, with no new signals identified.
Separately, the companies announced positive Phase 3 results for an investigational once-weekly oral HIV regimen combining islatravir and lenacapavir. The regimen met its primary efficacy endpoint in two studies, ISLEND-1 and ISLEND-2, which evaluated its safety and efficacy in people living with HIV who were already virologically suppressed.
HIV Trial Results
The primary endpoint in both studies measured the percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA levels of at least 50 copies/mL at Week 48 under the FDA snapshot algorithm. In the ISLEND-1 study, patients switched from Biktarvy to the once-weekly islatravir/lenacapavir regimen. The treatment was found to be statistically non-inferior to Biktarvy. Meanwhile, in the open-label ISLEND-2 trial, the regimen demonstrated statistical non-inferiority compared with standard-of-care daily oral antiretroviral therapies.
| Study | Comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|
| ISLEND-1 | Biktarvy | Statistically non-inferior |
| ISLEND-2 | Standard-of-care therapies | Statistically non-inferior |
The safety profile of the combination was generally comparable to the comparator regimens in both studies, with no new safety concerns identified.
Next Steps for HIV Treatment
Gilead and Merck plan to submit the Phase 3 findings to regulatory authorities worldwide and present detailed data at a future scientific congress. The investigational combination targets multiple stages of HIV-1 replication. If approved, the treatment could offer virologically suppressed patients a long-acting, once-weekly oral single-tablet option.
How will the discontinuation of the KEYNOTE-D46/EVOKE-03 trial impact the broader development strategy for Trodelvy in lung cancer?
What competitive advantages could the once-weekly islatravir/lenacapavir regimen offer over existing daily therapies in the HIV market?
Will the FDA require additional long-term safety data before approving the weekly oral HIV regimen?

























