Garden Reach Shipbuilders Q1FY27 revenue rises 38.5% to ₹1,814.6 crore
GRSE's Q1FY27 results show significant growth with revenue at ₹1,814.6 crore and net profit at ₹172.8 crore. Margins expanded to 9.52%, supported by efficient cost management and strong defence contract execution.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd reported a robust top-line expansion in Q1FY27, with revenue from operations surging 38.5% year-on-year to ₹1,814.6 crore, driven by accelerated execution of defence contracts. The Ministry of Defence undertaking posted a net profit of ₹172.8 crore for the quarter ended June 30, 2026, marking a 43.8% increase over the ₹120.2 crore recorded in Q1FY26. This performance underscores the company’s improving operational efficiency and strong demand pipeline for naval vessels and defence equipment.
The Board of Directors approved the unaudited financial results at a meeting held on July 29, 2026, in Kolkata. The results were reviewed by Statutory Auditors Guha Nandi & Co., who issued a limited review report pursuant to Regulations 33 and 52 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The company is exempted from segment reporting requirements by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs due to its engagement in defence production.
Key Financial Highlights
Garden Reach Shipbuilders demonstrated broad-based growth across key profitability metrics. Earnings per share (EPS) rose to ₹15.09 from ₹10.49 in the corresponding period last year. Total income for the quarter stood at ₹1,914.2 crore, comprising ₹1,814.6 crore from operations and ₹99.6 crore from other income.
| Metric: | Q1FY27 | Q1FY26 | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from Operations | ₹1,814.6 crore | ₹1,309.9 crore | +38.5% |
| Net Profit After Tax | ₹172.8 crore | ₹120.2 crore | +43.8% |
| EBITDA* | ₹231.5 crore | ₹166.7 crore | +38.9% |
| EPS (Basic & Diluted) | ₹15.09 | ₹10.49 | +43.8% |
*EBITDA calculated as Profit Before Tax plus Finance Costs, Depreciation, and Amortisation.
Profitability and Operational Efficiency
The company’s net profit margin improved to 9.52% in Q1FY27, up from 9.17% in Q1FY26, reflecting better cost management despite higher material consumption costs. Cost of materials consumed rose to ₹1,244.2 crore from ₹679.9 crore year-on-year, aligning with the increased revenue volume. Sub-contracting charges also increased significantly to ₹81.5 crore from ₹235.6 million, indicating active project outsourcing to meet delivery timelines.
Operating expenses remained controlled, with employee benefits expense at ₹101.3 crore, slightly lower than the ₹112.0 crore incurred in Q4FY26. Finance costs were minimal at ₹3.8 crore, benefiting from the company’s debt-free balance sheet structure. The debt-equity ratio remained negligible at 0.014 times, reinforcing the firm’s strong financial stability.
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between revenue growth (38.5%) and net profit growth (43.8%) highlights an operating leverage effect, where fixed costs are spread over a larger revenue base. The improvement in net profit margin from 9.17% to 9.52% suggests that the company is successfully converting higher order inflows into superior bottom-line gains. Additionally, the inventory turnover ratio improved to 2.23 times from 1.42 times, indicating faster movement of work-in-progress and finished goods, which enhances cash flow efficiency. However, the trade receivables turnover ratio declined sharply to 6.27 times from 17.91 times, potentially signaling longer collection cycles or changes in billing recognition patterns that warrant monitoring in subsequent quarters.
Historical Stock Returns for Garden Reach Shipbuilders
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0.64% | +0.30% | -1.88% | +4.32% | +5.31% | +1,197.53% |
How might the sharp decline in trade receivables turnover impact Garden Reach's cash flow management and working capital requirements in upcoming quarters?
Given the significant rise in sub-contracting charges, what risks does the company face regarding supply chain dependencies and quality control for future naval vessel deliveries?
Will the current operating leverage effect be sustainable as material consumption costs continue to rise, or are there measures in place to protect net profit margins?


































