Forbes & Company shareholders approve independent director commission resolution
- Special resolution on independent director commission passed with 99.95% votes in favour
- Promoter group voted unanimously in favour, representing 9,359,293 shares
- Public institutions voted against the resolution with 89.81% dissent among polled votes
- Total eligible shares for voting stood at 12,898,616 as of cut-off date August 28, 2026

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Forbes & Company shareholders approved a special resolution regarding the payment of commission to Independent Directors. The resolution was passed with 99.95% of the total valid votes cast in favour, as disclosed in the company's October 5, 2026 filing.
The voting process, conducted through remote e-voting, concluded on October 3, 2026. A total of 12,898,616 shares were eligible to vote, with 9,376,934 shares participating in the poll. The promoter and promoter group held 9,525,691 shares and voted unanimously in favour of the resolution.
Voting Breakdown by Shareholder Category
The scrutiny report detailed the voting patterns across different shareholder categories. While promoters voted entirely in favour, public institutional shareholders showed significant dissent, whereas non-institutional public shareholders largely supported the proposal.
| Category | Shares Held | Votes Polled | In Favour | Against | % In Favour |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoter and Promoter Group | 9,525,691 | 9,359,293 | 9,359,293 | 0 | 100.00% |
| Public-Institutions | 1,109,004 | 2,374 | 242 | 2,132 | 10.19% |
| Public-Non Institutions | 2,263,921 | 15,267 | 12,918 | 2,349 | 84.61% |
| Total | 12,898,616 | 9,376,934 | 9,372,453 | 4,481 | 99.95% |
What the Numbers Show
A distinct divergence exists between institutional and non-institutional public shareholders. Public institutions, holding 1,109,004 shares, voted overwhelmingly against the resolution, with 89.81% of their polled votes cast in dissent. In contrast, non-institutional public shareholders supported the measure with 84.61% of their polled votes in favour. Despite this institutional opposition, the overwhelming support from the promoter group, which constituted the vast majority of the voting power, ensured the resolution's passage.
Historical Stock Returns for Forbes & Company
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1.02% | -9.02% | -14.15% | -18.26% | -27.25% | +91.16% |
How might the significant dissent from institutional investors influence Forbes & Company's future corporate governance ratings and ESG scores?
Will the high promoter voting power continue to marginalize minority shareholder influence in upcoming annual general meetings?
Could the institutional opposition signal a broader trend of foreign and domestic funds reducing their stake in the company?


































