Forbes & Company seeks shareholder approval for independent director commission
- Forbes & Company seeks shareholder approval for a special resolution to pay commission to independent directors
- Proposed remuneration is up to 1% of net profits or ₹60 lakh aggregate under Schedule V if profits are inadequate
- Standalone revenue fell to ₹7,313.90 lakh in FY26 from ₹19,684.12 lakh in FY25
- Remote e-voting opens on September 4, 2026, and closes on October 3, 2026

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Forbes & Company Limited has issued a postal ballot notice seeking shareholder approval for a special resolution to pay commission to its independent directors. The proposal aims to formalize remuneration structures in line with regulatory requirements and the company’s evolving governance needs.
The Board of Directors, on the recommendation of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee, proposed the resolution at its meeting held on August 14, 2026. Shareholders are being asked to vote via remote e-voting, with the process commencing on September 4, 2026, at 9:00 am and concluding on October 3, 2026, at 5:00 pm.
Remuneration Structure
The special resolution seeks consent to pay a commission not exceeding 1% per annum of the company’s net profits to independent directors. This payment is in addition to sitting fees and reimbursement of expenses for attending board and committee meetings.
In the event of no profits or inadequate profits, the company proposes to pay remuneration in accordance with Schedule V of the Companies Act, 2013. The aggregate limit under this provision is set at ₹60 lakh, which translates to ₹20 lakh for each of the three independent directors.
The explanatory statement notes that the role and responsibilities of independent directors have increased due to strengthened corporate governance norms under the Companies Act, 2013, and SEBI LODR regulations. The directors are involved in guiding strategy, risk management, and compliance, requiring greater time commitment.
Financial Context
The resolution comes against a backdrop of fluctuating financial performance. Standalone revenue from operations fell significantly to ₹7,313.90 lakh in FY26, down from ₹19,684.12 lakh in FY25. Similarly, standalone profit after tax declined to ₹1,471.88 lakh in FY26 from ₹2,693.47 lakh in the previous year.
| Metric | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from Operations (Standalone) | ₹12,345.15 lakh | ₹19,684.12 lakh | ₹7,313.90 lakh |
| Profit After Tax (Standalone) | ₹2,033.19 lakh | ₹2,693.47 lakh | ₹1,471.88 lakh |
The company attributed the impact on profitability in the Coding and Industrial Automation business to under-absorption of overheads, currency fluctuations, and higher commodity prices. In the Real Estate segment, major revenues from the VICINIA project were recognized in earlier years.
What the Numbers Show
The decision to seek approval for Schedule V remuneration limits is driven by caution regarding future profitability. With standalone revenue contracting sharply in FY26 and the company citing potential lower-than-expected revenues in the automation business for FY27, the board is ensuring that director compensation remains viable even if profits do not support the 1% commission model.
Voting Details
The cut-off date for voting eligibility is August 28, 2026. The notice is being sent electronically to shareholders registered with NSDL and CDSL. Mr. Harshvardhan Tarkas, Practicing Company Secretary, has been appointed as the scrutinizer for the e-voting process. Results will be declared on or before October 6, 2026.
Historical Stock Returns for Forbes & Company
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0.02% | -6.95% | +4.12% | -19.49% | -40.07% | +146.81% |
How might the proposed 1% commission structure impact Forbes & Company's cash flow if FY27 revenues continue to decline as projected?
What specific strategic initiatives is the board implementing to reverse the sharp contraction in the Coding and Industrial Automation segment for FY27?
Could the reliance on Schedule V remuneration limits signal to investors that management expects prolonged profitability challenges, potentially affecting stock valuation?


































