Everest Industries faces ₹1.36 crore GST demand over ITC claims
Everest Industries received a ₹1.36 crore GST show cause notice alleging ineligible ITC and RCM short payments for FY21-FY24. The company disputes the claim, stating no material financial impact is expected as it prepares a legal defense.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Everest Industries Limited has received a show cause notice (DRC-01) from the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Department seeking a tax demand of ₹1,35,68,692. The notice, issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax in Kurukshetra, Haryana, on July 24, 2026, alleges wrong availment of ineligible input tax credit (ITC) and short-payment of GST under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM). The company disclosed that it firmly believes in its legal grounds and expects no material impact on its financials or operations.
The disclosure was made pursuant to Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, read with SEBI Master Circular No. HO/49/14/14(7)2025-CFD-POD2/I/3762/2026 dated January 30, 2026. The notice was served under Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017, Section 74 of the HGST Act, 2017, and Section 20 of the IGST Act, 2017. Everest Industries confirmed receipt of the notice at 18:23 hrs IST on July 24, 2026, and is currently preparing a response.
Key Allegations in the Notice
The GST Department raised objections concerning transactions spanning financial years 2020-21 to 2023-24. The primary concerns cited in the show cause notice include:
| Issue Category | Specific Allegation | Applicable Period |
|---|---|---|
| Input Tax Credit | Wrong availment of ineligible ITC | FY2021–FY24 |
| Hotel Expenses | Ineligible ITC availed on accommodation | FY2021–FY24 |
| RCM Payments | Short-payment of GST on freight services | FY2021–FY24 |
| RCM Payments | Short-payment of GST on security services | FY2021–FY24 |
The total quantum of the claim raised is ₹1,35,68,692. This figure represents the tax demand alleged by the department; however, as this is only a preliminary show cause notice, no final liability has been established.
Company Response and Financial Impact
Everest Industries stated that it maintains strong legal and factual grounds to contest the demand. The company emphasized that it will take all necessary actions to present and defend its case before the relevant authorities. Management does not consider it likely that the potential demand will materialize as a claim against the company or result in a liability. Consequently, the firm reported no expected material financial implications, including compensation or penalties, at this stage.
What the Numbers Show
The notice covers a four-year period (FY21 to FY24), suggesting a retrospective audit focus on compliance mechanisms rather than a single transactional error. The allegations center on procedural compliance—specifically the eligibility of input credits and the correct application of reverse charge mechanisms on service inputs like freight and security. Since the company has not provisioned for this amount, citing low likelihood of materialization, the immediate balance sheet impact remains neutral. However, the resolution timeline depends on the company’s response and subsequent hearings with the Kurukshetra tax authorities.
Historical Stock Returns for Everest Industries
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +4.65% | +4.64% | +33.89% | +24.10% | -6.57% | +17.97% |
How might the prolonged litigation timeline for this GST dispute affect Everest Industries' cash flow management and working capital requirements?
Could this show cause notice trigger a broader regulatory scrutiny of input tax credit compliance across the Indian steel and metal manufacturing sector?
What are the potential implications for Everest Industries' stock valuation if the company is forced to provision for this liability in future quarterly reports?


































