Ethos research shows 70% of Americans delay life insurance purchase
- New research shows 70% of Americans delay buying life insurance despite knowing they need it
- Nearly 40% assume costs are unaffordable, though 43% would have acted sooner with accurate pricing
- About 30% wait nearly a year and 17% wait over two years to secure family coverage
- Major life events like marriage or buying a home are key triggers for purchasing policies
- Ethos reduces underwriting time from weeks to minutes via an online, no-exam application

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
New research from Ethos reveals that 70% of Americans knew they needed life insurance long before purchasing a policy, highlighting a significant gap between awareness and action. The data, shared by Chief Underwriter Nichole Myers during a media tour for Life Insurance Awareness Month, underscores persistent barriers to coverage adoption.
Consumer Behavior and Delays
The delay in securing coverage is substantial for many households. Approximately 30% of respondents waited nearly a year to get coverage for their family, while another 17% waited more than two years. This procrastination persists despite widespread concern about financial security, with around 67% of people stating they would worry about their family's financial future if something happened to them.
Key life events often trigger the decision to act. Myers identified getting married, expecting a child, buying a house, and losing or watching a loved one age as primary catalysts. These milestones force individuals to confront mortality and reassess their protection needs.
Cost Misconceptions as Primary Barrier
The dominant reason for non-purchase is a misconception regarding affordability. Nearly 40% of people assumed the cost was out of reach. However, Myers noted that 43% said they would have acted sooner if they had known the actual cost. For context, a healthy 30-year-old can secure meaningful coverage for approximately $1 a day. This suggests the barrier is largely educational rather than economic.
| Metric | Percentage | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Awareness Gap | 70% | Knew need but delayed purchase |
| Delay >1 Year | 30% | Waited nearly a year for coverage |
| Delay >2 Years | 17% | Waited more than two years |
| Cost Misconception | 40% | Assumed cost was out of reach |
| Would Act Sooner | 43% | If aware of actual low costs |
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between high awareness (70%) and high cost misconception (40%) indicates that market education is more critical than product availability. Since 43% of consumers would have purchased earlier with accurate pricing information, the friction lies in perception rather than access or affordability for the average healthy consumer.
Simplified Application Process
Ethos aims to reduce procedural friction by compressing the traditional 6-to-8-week underwriting process into a 10-minute online application. The platform eliminates medical exams, blood work, and paper documentation, allowing many users to obtain coverage on the same day. Consumers can start the process via ethos.com.
Historical Stock Returns for Ethos
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.63% | -4.70% | -1.37% | +20.79% | +14.45% | 0.0% |
How might Ethos's simplified underwriting model influence traditional insurers to adopt similar digital-first strategies to capture the procrastinating consumer segment?
What regulatory or compliance challenges could arise as life insurance companies increasingly rely on non-medical data for rapid underwriting decisions?
Could targeted educational campaigns addressing cost misconceptions significantly reduce the 30% of consumers who delay coverage by over a year?


































