Supreme Petrochem Ltd intimation of ESG rating assigned by CRISIL ESG Ratings & Analytics
CRISIL ESG Ratings & Analytics Limited independently assigned an Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) rating to Supreme Petrochem Ltd based on publicly available information. The company clarified that it did not engage the agency for this assessment and has not agreed to the assigned rating in any manner. The disclosure was submitted to the stock exchanges on July 1, 2026.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
CRISIL ESG Ratings & Analytics Limited has independently assigned an Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) rating to Supreme Petrochem Ltd based on publicly available information. The company clarified that it did not engage the agency for this assessment and has not agreed to the assigned rating in any manner. The disclosure was submitted to the stock exchanges on July 1, 2026.
Independent Assessment
The rating was assigned by CRISIL ESG Ratings & Analytics Limited without any solicitation or participation from Supreme Petrochem Ltd. The agency utilized only public information to evaluate the company's environmental, social, and governance practices. Consequently, the company has not endorsed or validated the findings associated with this rating.
Regulatory Disclosure
This intimation was filed pursuant to Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The communication was addressed to BSE Limited and the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd to ensure the information was available to shareholders and the market. The filing was signed by D. N. Mishra, A.V.P (Legal) & Company Secretary of Supreme Petrochem Ltd.
Historical Stock Returns for Supreme Petrochem
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +1.96% | -2.09% | +3.23% | +12.07% | -13.46% | +99.60% |
How might this unsolicited ESG rating influence investor perception of Supreme Petrochem's sustainability practices?
Could Supreme Petrochem challenge the accuracy of the rating given their lack of involvement in the assessment process?
Will this incident prompt other companies to proactively engage with ESG rating agencies to avoid unsolicited evaluations?































