US court dismisses Natsoft patent claims against Hexaware
A US federal court dismissed all patent infringement claims by Natsoft Corporation and Updraft, LLC against Hexaware Technologies and its subsidiary, ruling the asserted patents were abstract and ineligible for protection. The decision, dated June 9, 2026, dismissed nine patents across two families and related state-law claims, though plaintiffs may file an amended complaint. Hexaware confirmed the litigation has no material impact on its operations or financial position.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
A US federal court has dismissed all claims in a patent infringement lawsuit filed by Natsoft Corporation and its affiliate Updraft, LLC against hexaware technologies and its subsidiary. The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois ruled on June 9, 2026, that the asserted patents claimed broad, abstract ideas rather than specific inventions, rendering them ineligible for patent protection under US law. This decision resulted in the dismissal of nine patents across two patent families and related state-law claims. The initial claim in the litigation was USD 500 million.
Case Background and Ruling
The lawsuit alleged infringement of nine patents spanning two patent families. The Court's decision centered on the deficiency in Natsoft's patents, finding them too abstract to qualify as patentable inventions. Consequently, the Court declined to retain jurisdiction over related state-law claims. While the Court has granted plaintiffs time to file an amended complaint adding a new federal claim, Hexaware maintains that its platforms—Amaze®, Tensai®, and RapidX®—are the result of original engineering and substantial investment, holding its own US patents for methods embodied in these platforms.
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Plaintiff | Natsoft Corporation and Updraft, LLC |
| Defendant | Hexaware Technologies Limited and Hexaware Technologies Inc. |
| Court | United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Ruling Date | June 9, 2026 |
| Patents Involved | Nine patents across two patent families |
| Court Finding | Patents declared abstract and ineligible |
Business and Financial Impact
Hexaware Technologies has confirmed that the litigation has caused no material change to its operations, ability to serve customer commitments, partner programs, or financial position. The company anticipates no such changes in the future. The resolution follows a motion to dismiss filed by the company in December 2025.
Historical Stock Returns for Hexaware Technologies
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.72% | -5.67% | -0.72% | -33.31% | -41.00% | -34.61% |
Will Natsoft and Updraft attempt to file an amended complaint with a new federal claim, or is this likely the end of the litigation road?
How will this dismissal influence Hexaware's future R&D investment strategy regarding the protection of its intellectual property?
Could this ruling set a precedent that discourages similar 'abstract idea' patent lawsuits against other technology firms in the sector?


































