Clean Science & Technology files FY26 BRSR with ESG targets
Clean Science & Technology Limited filed its FY26 BRSR, disclosing a 12.19% rise in specific GHG emissions due to product mix changes. Renewable electricity share grew marginally to 52%. The company maintained zero safety incidents and increased training hours by 28%.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Clean Science & Technology Limited filed its Business Responsibility and Sustainability Report (BRSR) for the financial year ended March 31, 2026, with the Bombay Stock Exchange and the National Stock Exchange of India Limited on August 17, 2026. The submission, made pursuant to Regulation 34(2)(f) of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, details the company’s environmental, social, and governance performance alongside its strategic sustainability targets.
The company reported progress against its medium-term ESG goals, which extend to FY28. While specific greenhouse gas emissions, water consumption, and energy consumption increased compared to the 2022-23 baseline, management attributed this rise primarily to a change in product mix during the reporting period. Conversely, the share of renewable electricity consumption saw a marginal increase, rising from approximately 51% in 2022-23 to approximately 52% in FY26.
Key ESG Metrics and Targets
Clean Science & Technology has set specific targets to be achieved by FY28, focusing on environmental sustainability, social responsibility, and corporate governance. The following table highlights the key environmental targets and their current status relative to the 2022-23 baseline:
| Metric: | 2022-23 Baseline | FY26 Performance | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Specific GHG Emissions: | 3.69 tCO2e/MT production | 4.14 tCO2e/MT production | +12.19% |
| Specific Water Consumption: | 11.52 kL water/MT production | 12.82 kL water/MT production | +11.28% |
| Renewable Electricity Share: | Marginal Increase | ||
| Specific Energy Consumption: | 37.55 GJ/MT production | 42.62 GJ/MT production | +13.50% |
Despite the increase in specific emission intensities, the company stated that various positive actions have been initiated to control and improve performance in these areas. All manufacturing facilities maintain Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) status.
Social and Governance Highlights
In the social domain, the company reported a 28% increase in total training man-hours, rising to 27,930 hours in FY26 from 21,802 hours in 2022-23. This training covered safety, technical, and HR topics for both staff and contractual manpower. The company maintained a record of zero casualties and zero reportable injury incidents during the year.
Regarding governance, Clean Science & Technology confirmed it maintained a robust framework focused on compliance and transparency. The company reported no auditor qualifications or restatements and achieved 100% compliance with all statutory requirements. The Board of Directors retains oversight of the business responsibility policies, with quarterly reviews conducted by the Managing Director, Executive Directors, and functional heads.
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between the company’s absolute renewable energy consumption and its specific emission intensities highlights the impact of operational scale and product mix. While renewable electricity generation increased in absolute terms (from ~54,798 GJ to ~57,690 GJ), specific GHG emissions rose by 12.19%. This suggests that the shift in product mix towards more energy-intensive or chemically complex products outpaced the efficiency gains from increased renewable energy adoption during the period.
Historical Stock Returns for Clean Science & Technology
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +2.45% | +5.85% | +11.03% | +13.09% | -28.73% | -44.91% |
How does Clean Science & Technology plan to offset the 12% rise in specific GHG emissions to meet its FY28 sustainability targets?
What specific capital expenditures or technological upgrades are scheduled to improve energy efficiency in the company's more intensive product lines?
Will the shift towards higher-energy products impact the company's cost structure and competitive pricing power in the upcoming fiscal year?


































