All Time Plastics Limited will host analyst and institutional investor meetings on October 9, 2026, starting at 10:00 am. The sessions will be conducted at the company's operational facilities in Daman, Silvassa, and Khatalwada, Gujarat.

Meeting details and compliance

The company issued an intimation to BSE and NSE regarding the schedule of these interactions under Regulation 30(6) of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The meeting is scheduled for Friday, October 9, 2026.

Disclosure guidelines

Discussions during the meeting will be restricted to publicly available information. The company explicitly stated that no unpublished price sensitive information (UPSI) is intended to be discussed during the interactions. This adherence to regulatory norms ensures a level playing field for all market participants.

The intimation noted that changes to the schedule may occur due to exigencies on the part of participants or the company. The communication was signed by Antony Alapat, Company Secretary, on September 28, 2026.

All Time Plastics Limited successfully concluded its 26th Annual General Meeting (AGM) on September 24, 2026, with all six proposed resolutions passing with the requisite majority. The meeting was conducted via Video Conferencing and Other Audio-Visual Means in compliance with regulatory guidelines.

The agenda included the adoption of audited standalone and consolidated financial statements for FY26, alongside the reappointment of Mr. Nilesh Punamchand Shah as a director retiring by rotation. Shareholders also approved the reappointment of M/s Walker Chandiok & Co LLP as statutory auditors for a five-year term ending at the conclusion of the 31st AGM.

Key Voting Outcomes

The voting results indicated strong shareholder support for core governance and operational matters. However, related-party remuneration approvals saw notable dissent from institutional investors.

Related Party Remuneration Details

Resolutions 4 and 5 pertained to increasing the remuneration for Mr. Akshay Shah (Head - Supply Chain) and Mr. Dhvanit Shah (Strategic Business Head), both relatives of directors. The proposal sought to increase their annual remuneration from ₹60 lakh to an amount not exceeding ₹1 crore each. While these resolutions passed, they received the highest opposition among all items on the agenda.

What the Numbers Show

A divergence is visible between promoter and institutional voting patterns on related-party transactions. For Resolutions 4 and 5, institutional shareholders cast 18.51% of their votes against the remuneration hikes, totaling 1,314,536 votes against. In contrast, non-institutional public shareholders showed near-unanimous support with only 0.02% opposition. Promoter group votes were largely excluded from these specific tallies due to interest disclosures, leaving institutional sentiment as the primary driver of the dissenting block.