Kaushalya Infrastructure shareholders approve sale of major land assets
- Kaushalya Infrastructure shareholders approved the sale of land constituting substantially the whole undertaking.
- Special resolutions for asset disposal received 1,85,836 votes in favour against just 8 votes against.
- Promoter group voted 100% in favour, holding 1,78,061 shares out of 3,46,306 total shares polled.
- Public non-institutional shareholders polled only 7,783 votes despite holding 1,68,237 shares.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Kaushalya Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited held its 34th Annual General Meeting (AGM) on September 28, 2026, where shareholders approved special resolutions for the sale of land constituting substantially the whole of the company's undertaking.
The meeting was conducted through two-way Video Conferencing and Other Audio-Visual Means (OAVM). Mr. Mahesh Mehra, Whole-time Director, was elected as Chairman. The proceedings included the adoption of standalone and consolidated financial statements for FY26 and the re-appointment of Mr. Mehra as a director retiring by rotation.
Key Resolutions Passed
Shareholders voted on four key items of business, including two special resolutions related to asset disposal. The scrutinizer's report confirmed that all resolutions were passed with requisite majority.
| Resolution | Type | Description | Votes in Favour | Votes Against |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ordinary | Adoption of financial statements for FY26 | 1,85,841 | 3 |
| 2 | Ordinary | Re-appointment of Mahesh Mehra as director | 1,85,841 | 3 |
| 3 | Special | Sale of land (substantially whole undertaking) | 1,85,836 | 8 |
| 4 | Special | Disposal of undertaking under Section 180(1)(a) | 1,85,836 | 8 |
Meeting Proceedings and Voting
The Company Secretary confirmed that 45 members attended the meeting via video conferencing, satisfying the requisite quorum. E-voting facilities were provided for all resolutions, with remote e-voting results announced following the meeting's conclusion. The voting period for remote e-voting commenced at 9:00 am on September 25, 2026, and ended at 5:00 pm on September 27, 2026.
The Chairman noted that the AGM notice and annual report were pre-circulated to shareholders via email. Queries raised by registered speakers were addressed by the Company Secretary and CFO during the session.
Voting Breakdown by Shareholder Category
The voting results indicate strong promoter support, with promoters holding 1,78,061 shares voting entirely in favour across all resolutions. Public non-institutional shareholders held 1,68,237 shares, with a small fraction voting against the special resolutions regarding asset disposal.
| Category | Shares Held | Votes Polled | In Favour | Against |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoter and Promoter Group | 1,78,061 | 1,78,061 | 1,78,061 | 0 |
| Public Institutions | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Public Non Institutions | 1,68,237 | 7,783 | 7,775 | 8 |
| Total | 3,46,306 | 1,85,844 | 1,85,836 | 8 |
Note: Totals for Resolution 1 and 2 show 3 votes against; Totals for Resolution 3 and 4 show 8 votes against.
What the Numbers Show
The voting data reveals a significant concentration of power in the promoter group, which holds approximately 51.4% of the total shares polled (1,78,061 out of 3,46,306). While public non-institutional shareholders held a substantial block of 1,68,237 shares, only 7,783 votes were polled from this category, indicating low participation or engagement from the retail public compared to the promoters who voted 100% of their holdings. The margin of approval remained overwhelming (over 99.9%) despite minor dissent from public shareholders on the asset disposal resolutions.
Historical Stock Returns for Kaushalya Infrastructure
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1.05% | +0.30% | +0.53% | -6.13% | -17.20% | +32,743.14% |
What is the estimated timeline for completing the land sale and the subsequent distribution of proceeds to shareholders?
Will the company initiate a voluntary delisting process following the disposal of substantially all its assets?
How will the regulatory authorities scrutinize the valuation methodology used for the land sale given the overwhelming promoter control?


































