Bessent predicts oil could drop to $40-$50 if Iran conflict ends
- Scott Bessent predicts oil could fall to $40-$50 per barrel if the Iran conflict ends and supply surges.
- Peter Schiff mocked the prediction, stating he does not believe Bessent's claims.
- Larry Fink previously warned oil could drop below $50 if Iran is neutralized but rise to $150 if conflict persists.
- Brent crude futures traded at $97.03, while WTI crude was at $91.87 at the time of writing.
- Oil ETFs showed mixed performance, with UCO up 1.24% and USO down 0.091%.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent projected that global oil prices could decline to $40 or $50 per barrel following the resolution of the Iran conflict. He attributed this potential price compression to a significant surge in supply entering the market once geopolitical constraints ease.
Supply Dynamics and Price Outlook
In an interview on Fox News, Bessent stated that the current energy supply shock is temporary. He argued that resolving the conflict would unlock constrained supply, leading to a steep drop in prices. The Treasury Secretary emphasized that the US economy is undergoing a productivity burst and remains resilient, citing solid job and wage growth.
Bessent also highlighted structural changes in global energy logistics. He predicted that the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz would diminish as Gulf nations develop alternative pipeline routes. This shift, he noted, would reduce Iran's ability to disrupt oil flows, a capability he previously identified as an energy choke point for many nations, though not for the US.
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Projected Oil Price Range | $40 - $50 | Post-conflict supply surge |
| Current Brent Crude | $97.03 | October futures |
| Current WTI Crude | $91.87 | October futures |
Market Reaction and Contrasting Views
Economist Peter Schiff publicly dismissed Bessent's outlook. On X, Schiff wrote, "Don't believe anything this guy says. I don't think he believes what he is saying either." This skepticism contrasts with earlier comments from BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, who aligned with Bessent's view that oil could crash below $50 if Iran is neutralized and its supply returns to global markets.
However, Fink also warned of a bearish alternative scenario. He noted that if the conflict continues and Iran remains a threat to global energy supplies, oil prices could stay elevated for years, potentially reaching $150 a barrel. Such an outcome would have severe consequences for the global economy.
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between current market pricing and executive projections highlights significant uncertainty in energy markets. With Brent crude trading at $97.03 and WTI at $91.87, both benchmarks are trading well above the $40-$50 range predicted by Bessent and Fink under a resolution scenario. The gap suggests that market participants are currently pricing in prolonged geopolitical risk rather than an imminent supply flood.
Trading Activity
On Friday, United States Brent Oil Fund (NYSE: BNO) rose 0.38%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (NYSE: UCO) climbed 1.24%. In contrast, the United States Oil Fund (NYSE: USO) fell 0.091%.
How might the development of alternative pipeline routes by Gulf nations impact long-term geopolitical leverage in the Middle East beyond just oil prices?
What specific macroeconomic indicators would signal that the market is shifting from pricing in prolonged geopolitical risk to anticipating the predicted supply surge?
If oil prices remain elevated near $100 despite conflict resolution efforts, what alternative factors could be driving demand or constraining supply?

































