Supreme Court Judge Recuses from Vedanta PIL Case, New Bench to Hear Matter
A Supreme Court judge has recused from hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) against Vedanta, Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL), and Vedanta Resources. The PIL alleges financial irregularities, regulatory violations, and price manipulation by these companies, citing a Viceroy Research report. Allegations include financial manipulation, price rigging, and draining of listed Vedanta through large dividends. The petition claims regulatory inaction and seeks investigations by SEBI, RBI, and the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. The case will be listed before a new bench for further hearing.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
A significant development has occurred in the legal proceedings against Vedanta , Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL), and Vedanta Resources, as a Supreme Court judge has recused from hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) alleging financial irregularities, regulatory violations, and price manipulation by these companies.
PIL Allegations
The PIL, which cites a report by Viceroy Research, raises serious concerns about the financial practices of the companies involved. The allegations include:
- Financial manipulation
- Price rigging
- Regulatory violations
- Draining of listed Vedanta through large dividends and artificial brand fees
- Taking loans to purchase shares without proper disclosure of related-party transactions
Additionally, the petition claims that HZL failed to disclose pending litigation and statutory dues.
Regulatory Inaction Alleged
The petitioner has pointed out that regulatory authorities, including the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), Reserve Bank of India (RBI), and the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, have not responded to representations made by Viceroy Research regarding these issues.
Calls for Investigation
The PIL seeks directions for a comprehensive investigation by these regulatory bodies into the alleged violations. This request underscores the seriousness of the claims and the potential impact on investors and the market.
Case to be Heard by New Bench
Following the recusal of the Supreme Court judge, the case will now be listed before a different bench for further hearing. This move ensures that the matter will be heard afresh, maintaining the integrity of the judicial process.
The recusal and subsequent relisting of the case highlight the complexity and sensitivity of the allegations against these major players in the Indian mining and metals sector. As the case progresses, it will be closely watched by investors, regulatory bodies, and the wider business community for its potential implications on corporate governance and financial practices in India's corporate landscape.
Stakeholders and the public will be keenly awaiting the outcome of this case, which could have far-reaching consequences for the companies involved and potentially set precedents for corporate accountability and regulatory oversight in India.
Historical Stock Returns for Vedanta
1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
+2.94% | +1.21% | +2.52% | -2.24% | -1.82% | +250.40% |