Vedanta Boosts EV Metal Production Amid Legal Challenges
Vedanta announced a capital expenditure of over 125 billion rupees to increase metal production for the electric vehicle industry. Simultaneously, a Supreme Court judge recused himself from hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) against Vedanta, Hindustan Zinc Limited, and Vedanta Resources. The PIL alleges financial misconduct, including manipulation, regulatory violations, and undisclosed transactions. The petition seeks investigations by SEBI, RBI, and the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Vedanta , a leading diversified natural resources company in India, has announced a significant increase in capital spending exceeding 125.00 billion rupees to bolster metal production for the electric vehicle (EV) industry. This investment aims to enhance the company's capabilities in producing metals crucial for the growing EV sector.
Meanwhile, in a separate development, a Supreme Court judge has recused himself from hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) case against Vedanta, Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL), and Vedanta Resources. The case, which is based on the Viceroy Report, will now be heard by a different bench.
Details of the PIL
The PIL alleges serious financial misconduct by the companies, including:
- Financial manipulation
- Price rigging
- Regulatory violations
- Diversion of funds through large dividends and artificial brand fees
- Share price manipulation
- Undisclosed related-party transactions
The petition also claims that Vedanta Resources secured loans from Vedanta to acquire more shares without proper disclosure of pending litigations and statutory dues related to HZL.
Regulatory Probes Sought
The PIL seeks regulatory investigations by several agencies:
- Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI)
- Reserve Bank of India (RBI)
- Ministry of Corporate Affairs
The petitioner questions the inaction of these agencies despite representations from Viceroy, describing the case as involving large-scale financial misconduct that affects investors and public trust.
Implications and Looking Ahead
While Vedanta's substantial investment in EV metal production signifies a strategic move to capitalize on the growing electric vehicle market, the ongoing legal challenges could potentially impact the company and its associated entities. The reassignment of the PIL case to another bench may lead to a delay in the hearing.
As the situation unfolds, stakeholders, including investors, regulatory bodies, and the general public, will be keenly watching for any further developments in both the investment plans and the legal matter. The case adds another chapter to Vedanta's complex legal history and highlights the ongoing scrutiny of corporate governance in India's natural resources sector.
It's important to note that the recusal of a judge is a standard legal procedure designed to maintain the neutrality of the judicial system. As more information becomes available, a clearer picture of the case and its potential impact on Vedanta and related companies may emerge.
Historical Stock Returns for Vedanta
1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
+0.92% | +0.46% | +1.77% | -0.87% | +2.79% | +231.84% |