Bombay High Court Quashes Defamation Notice Against HDFC Bank CEO
The Bombay High Court has overturned a magistrate's order issuing a defamation notice to Sashidhar Jagdishan, MD and CEO of HDFC Bank. The court ruled that the magistrate failed to follow proper procedural requirements, specifically not recording the verification of the complainant and witnesses as mandated by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The defamation complaint was filed by a trustee of Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust. While the court set aside the magistrate's order, it clarified that the trial court can proceed with the case once proper verification procedures are followed.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
In a significant legal development, the Bombay High Court has overturned a magistrate's order that had issued a defamation notice to Sashidhar Jagdishan, the Managing Director and CEO of HDFC Bank . Justice SM Modak, presiding over the case, ruled that the magistrate had erred in issuing the notice without following proper procedural requirements.
Legal Procedural Error Highlighted
The court found that the magistrate had failed to record the verification of the complainant and witnesses before issuing the defamation notice. This step is mandated under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and its omission led to the quashing of the order.
Background of the Case
The defamation complaint was originally filed by the trustee of Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. While the specifics of the allegations against Jagdishan were not detailed in the court's decision, the case highlights the importance of adhering to proper legal procedures in defamation cases.
Court's Ruling and Future Proceedings
In its ruling, the Bombay High Court set aside the magistrate's order. However, Justice Modak clarified that this decision does not prevent the trial court from proceeding with the case. The court emphasized that the case can move forward once the proper verification procedures, as required by law, are followed.
Implications of the Ruling
This ruling underscores the significance of procedural compliance in legal proceedings, especially in cases involving high-profile corporate executives. It also serves as a reminder of the safeguards in place to ensure fair legal processes in defamation cases.
The court explicitly stated that it did not comment on the merits of the allegations against Jagdishan, leaving the door open for potential future legal proceedings if the proper procedures are followed.
As this legal matter unfolds, it will be closely watched by the banking and legal communities, given HDFC Bank's prominence in India's financial sector and the high-profile nature of the case involving its top executive.
Historical Stock Returns for HDFC Bank
1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.15% | +0.40% | -0.61% | +17.85% | +21.40% | +87.74% |