HDFC Bank Faces NRI Customer Complaints Over Alleged Misuse of Fixed Deposits

1 min read     Updated on 12 Jul 2025, 06:28 PM
scanxBy ScanX News Team
whatsapptwittershare
Overview

Four Non-Resident Indian customers have filed complaints against HDFC Bank, alleging misuse of their fixed deposits worth Rs 25-30 crore to purchase Credit Suisse's AT-1 bonds without consent. The complaints, lodged with the Economic Offences Wing in multiple cities, accuse bank officials of inflating customer eligibility for bond purchases, failing to disclose risks, and making unauthorized loan adjustments following the AT-1 bonds write-off in 2023. The case raises concerns about NRI investment protection and banking transparency, with potential implications for HDFC Bank's reputation and the broader banking sector.

13870715

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

HDFC Bank , one of India's leading private sector banks, is facing serious allegations from four Non-Resident Indian (NRI) customers who claim their fixed deposits were misused to purchase Credit Suisse's Additional Tier 1 (AT-1) bonds. The complaints, filed with the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) in multiple cities, allege fraud involving fixed deposits worth Rs 25-30 crore.

Allegations of Fraud

The complaints, which have been lodged in Nagpur, Chandigarh, and Gurgaon, paint a troubling picture of alleged misconduct by bank officials. The key allegations include:

  1. Misuse of Fixed Deposits: NRI customers claim that their fixed deposits, totaling between Rs 25-30 crore, were used without their knowledge or consent to purchase Credit Suisse's AT-1 bonds.

  2. Inflated Eligibility: Bank officials are accused of artificially inflating customers' eligibility for bond purchases, potentially exposing them to higher risks.

  3. Lack of Risk Disclosure: Complainants allege that they were not properly informed about the risks associated with the AT-1 bonds.

  4. Unauthorized Loan Adjustments: Following the write-off of AT-1 bonds in 2023, customers claim that their fixed deposits were used to adjust loans without their authorization.

Impact and Implications

This case raises serious concerns about the protection of NRI investments and the transparency of banking practices. The alleged misuse of fixed deposits, if proven true, could have significant repercussions for HDFC Bank's reputation and customer trust.

Ongoing Investigation

With complaints filed in multiple cities, the Economic Offences Wing is expected to conduct a thorough investigation into these allegations. The outcome of this investigation could have far-reaching implications for HDFC Bank and potentially for the broader banking sector's practices regarding NRI accounts and investment products.

As this situation develops, it will be crucial to monitor the bank's response to these allegations and any potential regulatory actions that may follow. HDFC Bank has not yet issued an official statement regarding these complaints at the time of reporting.

Historical Stock Returns for HDFC Bank

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
-1.12%-0.28%+1.71%+21.64%+22.31%+83.63%
HDFC Bank
View in Depthredirect
like20
dislike

HDFC Bank CEO's Case: Fourth Bombay High Court Judge Recuses

1 min read     Updated on 09 Jul 2025, 04:34 PM
scanxBy ScanX News Team
whatsapptwittershare
Overview

HDFC Bank's CEO, Sashidhar Jagdishan, is facing legal challenges as a fourth judge of the Bombay High Court recused from hearing his plea against an FIR. The FIR, filed by the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust, alleges that Jagdishan accepted a ₹2.05 crore bribe for financial advice. The case, charging cheating and fraud, is scheduled for hearing on July 14. This legal situation comes amid HDFC Bank's merger with HDFC Ltd, potentially impacting investor sentiment and the bank's reputation.

13604655

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

In a developing legal situation, HDFC Bank , one of India's leading private sector banks, finds itself at the center of attention as its CEO, Sashidhar Jagdishan, faces scrutiny over an FIR alleging cheating and fraud.

Judicial Recusals Mount

The case has taken an intriguing turn as a fourth judge of the Bombay High Court has recused from hearing Jagdishan's plea against the FIR. This series of recusals has raised eyebrows in legal circles and adds another layer of complexity to the ongoing case.

Allegations Against the CEO

The FIR at the heart of this legal matter was filed based on a complaint by the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust. The trust has leveled serious accusations against Jagdishan, alleging that he accepted a ₹2.05 crore bribe in exchange for financial advice.

Case Details

Category Details
Charges Cheating and fraud
Complainant Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust
Alleged Bribe Amount ₹2.05 crore
Next Hearing Date July 14

Implications for HDFC Bank

This legal challenge comes at a crucial time for HDFC Bank, as it navigates through a significant merger with HDFC Ltd. The allegations against its CEO could potentially impact investor sentiment and the bank's reputation in the short term.

What's Next?

As the case is scheduled for hearing on July 14, all eyes will be on the Bombay High Court. The repeated recusals by judges add an element of uncertainty to the proceedings, and it remains to be seen how this will affect the timeline and outcome of the case.

HDFC Bank and its stakeholders will be keenly watching the developments, as the resolution of this case could have significant implications for the bank's leadership and its ongoing strategic initiatives.

Historical Stock Returns for HDFC Bank

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
-1.12%-0.28%+1.71%+21.64%+22.31%+83.63%
HDFC Bank
View in Depthredirect
like17
dislike
More News on HDFC Bank
Explore Other Articles
1,983.70
-22.50
(-1.12%)