Tata Steel Secures Extended Court Protection in ₹4,313 Crore Mining Penalty Case
Tata Steel has secured extended court protection until December 19 in its legal challenge against mining penalty demands totaling ₹4,313.39 crores. The Orissa High Court granted interim relief in two separate writ petitions filed by the company, preventing authorities from taking coercive action regarding alleged shortfall in mineral dispatch from the Sukinda Chromite Block operations.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
The Orissa High Court has extended interim protection for Tata Steel until December 19 in two separate writ petitions challenging penalty demands totaling ₹4,313.39 crores related to alleged shortfall in mineral dispatch from the company's Sukinda Chromite Block operations.
Legal Proceedings and Timeline
The legal dispute involves two separate demand letters issued by the Deputy Director of Mines, Jajpur, for alleged violations of Rule 12-A of the Minerals Concession Rules, 2016. The first demand letter dated July 3 raised a penalty of ₹1,902.73 crores for the fourth year of operations, while the second demand letter dated October 3 sought ₹2,410.90 crores for the fifth year.
| Legal Case Details: | Information |
|---|---|
| Total Penalty Demand: | ₹4,313.39 crores |
| First Writ Petition: | No. 22431 of 2025 |
| Second Writ Petition: | No. 31035 of 2025 |
| Court: | Orissa High Court, Cuttack |
| Next Hearing: | December 19, 2025 |
Penalty Assessment Breakdown
The mining authorities have raised separate assessments for consecutive operational years under the Mine Development and Production Agreement, citing shortfall in chrome ore dispatch from the Sukinda Chromite Block.
| Assessment Period: | Penalty Amount | Demand Letter Date |
|---|---|---|
| 4th Year (July 2023-July 2024): | ₹1,902.73 crores | July 3, 2025 |
| 5th Year (July 2024-July 2025): | ₹2,410.90 crores | October 3, 2025 |
| Total Demand: | ₹4,313.39 crores | - |
Court Proceedings and Interim Relief
Tata Steel filed the first writ petition on August 8, seeking to quash the initial demand letter. The High Court granted interim protection on August 14, restraining authorities from taking coercive action. The second writ petition was filed on October 29, with similar interim protection granted on November 21.
Both petitions have been tagged with similar cases, and the court has consistently extended interim protection through multiple hearings. The latest extension came during the December 12 hearing, providing relief until the next scheduled hearing on December 19.
Regulatory Compliance and Disclosure
The company has made this disclosure in compliance with Regulations 30 and 51 of SEBI Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements Regulations, 2015. This follows the company's earlier disclosure dated December 4 regarding material litigations relating to the Sukinda Chromite Block.
| Regulatory Details: | Information |
|---|---|
| Reference Number: | SEC/1367/2025-26 |
| Disclosure Date: | December 12, 2025 |
| SEBI Regulations: | 30 and 51 |
| BSE Scrip Code: | 500470 |
| NSE Symbol: | TATASTEEL |
The interim protection prevents mining authorities from appropriating performance security or taking other coercive measures while the legal challenge remains pending before the High Court.
Historical Stock Returns for Tata Steel
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0.49% | +6.41% | +7.75% | +13.28% | +31.09% | +181.14% |
















































