Dan Ives says Microsoft and Meta are being treated like 'bear market' stocks

2 min read     Updated on 27 Jun 2026, 03:39 AM
scanx
Reviewed by
Radhika SScanX News Team
AI Summary

Microsoft Corp. and Meta Platforms Inc. are facing significant investor pressure despite spending hundreds of billions on AI infrastructure. Wedbush analyst Dan Ives describes the market as being in a "Twilight Zone" where investors reward immediate beneficiaries like Micron Technology Inc. while punishing hyperscalers funding the development. Ives notes that $700 billion in Big Tech cap-ex is fueling the AI buildout, but investors are frustrated by the lack of immediate returns, treating Microsoft and Meta like "bear market names." Despite this, Ives maintains a positive long-term outlook, calling the current weakness "short-term pain for long-term gain" and emphasizing that the AI revolution is only in its third year of a projected decade-long buildout.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
44025478

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Microsoft Corp. and Meta Platforms Inc. are spending hundreds of billions of dollars to build the artificial intelligence infrastructure powering the next generation of computing. Yet, according to Wedbush analyst Dan Ives, investors are rewarding the companies selling the picks and shovels while punishing those footing the bill. This dynamic has become especially evident following Micron Technology Inc.'s recent earnings, which reignited enthusiasm for AI memory stocks even as Microsoft and Meta continue to face heavy selling pressure.

Ives described the current market as a "Twilight Zone," arguing that investors have become increasingly impatient with hyperscalers waiting for their massive AI investments to translate into meaningful revenue growth. He noted that $700 billion of Big Tech capital expenditure this year is fueling the AI buildout, causing frustration among investors regarding the patience required for Microsoft and Meta to see returns. The analyst stated that these companies are being treated "like they are bear market names that cannot be owned," even though they remain central to the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

Market Rotation Favors Immediate Beneficiaries

Instead of buying the companies building AI platforms, investors have rotated into beneficiaries such as Micron and other AI infrastructure names that are already seeing stronger demand and earnings momentum. Ives believes the divergence reflects timing rather than fundamentals. Memory suppliers and infrastructure companies are benefiting immediately from the AI buildout as hyperscalers race to expand data centers and computing capacity.

Meanwhile, companies such as Microsoft, Meta, Amazon.com Inc. and Alphabet Inc. are still waiting for those investments to generate the next wave of monetization. "Meta is essentially looking to transform its business and that requires massive investments that will take some time to hit numbers," Ives said. That gap has encouraged investors to favor companies with more immediate AI revenue catalysts, even as hyperscalers continue to finance the industry's expansion.

Long-Term Outlook Remains Positive

Despite the recent divergence, Ives believes investors are becoming too focused on short-term uncertainty. The analyst argues the current weakness in Microsoft and Meta represents "short-term pain for long-term gain," reiterating his view that the AI revolution remains in its early stages. "We believe this is Year 3 of a 10-year AI buildout," Ives wrote, adding that the recent bearish narratives surrounding Big Tech have overshadowed what he sees as "future massive growth prospects." For investors willing to look beyond near-term monetization concerns, Ives believes today's "Twilight Zone" market could ultimately create some of the biggest buying opportunities in the AI trade.

What specific catalysts are needed to convince investors that the massive capital expenditures by hyperscalers are translating into tangible revenue growth?

How long can the current divergence between immediate beneficiaries like Micron and infrastructure builders like Microsoft and Meta persist before market sentiment shifts?

What potential risks could arise if the monetization of AI investments by hyperscalers takes longer than the anticipated 10-year buildout timeline?

like16
dislike

Analyst warns Microsoft could crash to $250 as tech stocks slide

2 min read     Updated on 26 Jun 2026, 05:49 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Radhika SScanX News Team
AI Summary

John Roque of 22V Research has dubbed the 'Magnificent Seven' the 'Maleficent 7' following a brutal June for Big Tech. Microsoft leads the declines, down 21.6%, with Roque warning the stock could fall to $250 if support at $350 fails.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
44021918

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Wall Street's famed 'Magnificent Seven' stocks may have earned a far less flattering nickname. John Roque, technical strategist at 22V Research, has launched a new name for the cohort that powered the 2020s bull market: the Maleficent 7. The call comes after a brutal June for Big Tech, with every member of the group in the red for the month. Microsoft Corp. leads the declines, down 21.6% and on pace for its worst monthly performance since December 2000.

Roque thinks Microsoft has the furthest to fall. The stock has traded below a downward-sloping 200-day moving average since February 2026. It was rejected at that falling average in early June and has dropped more than 18% since. It sits below its 50-day average too. The stock is now closing in on its March 2026 lows, a support level first reached in November 2023. By that measure, Microsoft has not made investors money in more than two and a half years. It also sits at a six-and-a-half-year low relative to the S&P 500.

Microsoft found support near $350 in April 2025 and again this past spring. Roque does not believe it holds. A break below $350 would, on his math, open the path to $250, measured down from the stock's failure near $450 in early June. That is roughly 30% below current levels.

Magnificent 7 Month-To-Date Performance (%)
Microsoft Corporation -21.55%
Amazon.com, Inc. -15.81%
Tesla, Inc. -14.16%
Meta Platforms, Inc. -13.89%
Apple Inc. -11.70%
Alphabet Inc. -9.69%
NVIDIA Corporation -7.80%

The downgrade is not Microsoft's alone. Roque's renamed 'Maleficent 7 index', as closely tracked by the Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF, trades below its 40-week moving average, which has begun to roll over. Momentum has turned, with bearish action relative to the S&P 500. Four of the seven names are down by double digits in 2026. Microsoft, Meta Platforms Inc. and Tesla Inc. hold the weakest technical scores. The three still higher on the year—Apple Inc., Alphabet Inc. and Nvidia Corp.—'aren't impressing anyone,' Roque said.

The fundamental story behind the slide is well documented: a capital-spending boom on AI data centers that is swallowing the free cash flow Microsoft once returned to shareholders. Roque's note adds a second signal. The chart, he said, is now confirming what the cash-flow math already implies.

If Microsoft breaks the $350 support level, what impact could a 30% decline have on the valuation of the broader AI sector?

How long can Apple, Alphabet, and Nvidia maintain their positive year-to-date performance if the 'Maleficent 7' index continues to roll over?

Will the sustained decline in free cash flow force Microsoft to adjust its capital expenditure strategy for AI data centers?

like18
dislike

More News on Microsoft Corp