Vance denies Iran's $9 billion claim against Kushner and Witkoff

1 min read     Updated on 17 Jul 2026, 03:51 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Shraddha JScanX News Team
AI Summary

U.S. Vice President JD Vance rejected a report claiming Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff generated $9 billion through market manipulation, calling the allegations 'completely bogus.' The report cited an Iranian official alleging the advisers exploited negotiations for profit, a claim Vance denied ever receiving. This dispute occurs alongside rising military conflict, with CENTCOM conducting consecutive strikes on Iranian targets and the recent U.S.-Iran memorandum deteriorating.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
45829299

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

U.S. Vice President JD Vance publicly dismissed a report accusing advisers Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff of profiting $9 billion from market manipulation during U.S.-Iran negotiations. Vance labeled the allegations as "completely bogus" in a post on X on Thursday, stating he never received a message from Iran regarding the matter. The Vice President defended the advisers as trusted members of the president’s team and close friends, emphasizing their efforts toward peace in the region.

Vance Publicly Defends Kushner And Witkoff

Vance responded directly to a report by Drop Site News, which cited an unnamed Iranian official claiming Tehran calculated $9 billion in alleged market-manipulation profits by President Donald Trump's associates. The report stated that Iran requested $4.5 billion through intermediaries and warned Vance during talks in Switzerland that the advisers were "abusing" negotiations for financial gain. Vance rejected these assertions, calling the idea that they were trading on insider information "absurd."

"I see a lot of BS flying around and I normally just ignore it," Vance wrote. "But Steve and Jared are good dudes and I’m honored to work with them."

Unverified Iran Claims Drive Fresh Dispute

The disputed report alleged that Iran warned the U.S. team that Kushner and Witkoff were "more interested in exploiting insider knowledge to profit in financial markets than reaching a deal." It further claimed that "the exchanged texts will ultimately become part of the historical record." Vance's denial followed his recent remarks on a podcast suggesting some Israeli officials were manipulating American public opinion to prolong the war, a sentiment Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed Trump agreed with regarding foreign influence.

Iran Accord Frays As Strikes Continue

Tensions have escalated as last month’s U.S.-Iran memorandum appears to be unraveling. The accord, which extended a ceasefire for 60 days and sought to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, has been violated by attacks on commercial vessels according to Washington. In response, CENTCOM announced that aircraft, drones, and warships struck dozens of Iranian military targets for a sixth consecutive night. More than 50,000 U.S. service members are currently operating across the Middle East. Trump has threatened to continue strikes into next week, noting that energy targets would be prioritized last, and recently abandoned a proposed 20% Hormuz fee.

How will these corruption allegations impact the credibility of ongoing U.S.-Iran negotiations?

What are the risks to regional stability if the 60-day ceasefire completely unravels?

Will the escalation of military strikes force the U.S. to reconsider abandoning the proposed 20% Strait of Hormuz fee?

like18
dislike

Prediction market assigns low probability to Trump visiting Iran

1 min read     Updated on 17 Jul 2026, 01:42 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Shriram SScanX News Team
AI Summary

Kalshi's prediction market shows a 4.7% chance of Trump visiting Iran by Jan 1, 2027, with over $1.5 million wagered. This follows CENTCOM strikes on Iranian infrastructure and reports of a potential Red Sea blockade by Houthis.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
45821510

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Amid escalating tensions between the U.S. and Iran, the prediction market is assigning a low probability to the prospect of Donald Trump visiting the country. Data from Kalshi, a federally authorized betting platform, shows that over $1.5 million has been bet on the contract "Will Donald Trump visit Iran?" Bettors have placed a 4.7% probability on the event occurring "Before Jan 1, 2027."

The market activity follows recent military actions in the region. The U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) revealed that it conducted fresh strikes against Iran, targeting Iranian military infrastructure. CENTCOM stated that "More than 50,000 U.S. service members are operating across the Middle East and remain vigilant, lethal, and ready."

Geopolitical risks remain elevated due to potential disruptions in critical shipping routes. Reports indicate that Iran has directed Yemen’s Houthi movement to prepare for the closure of the Red Sea oil route if the U.S. attacks Iranian power infrastructure. The Houthis have reportedly positioned missiles and drones near the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, the gateway to the Red Sea, to assault shipping.

Separately, another prediction market contract is focused on the duration of sanctions. Bettors are wagering on when the U.S. will announce the end of the Iran blockade. The current market data suggests a low probability that the U.S. will end the blockade by July 24.

Prediction Market Data

Metric Details
Platform Kalshi
Total Volume Over $1.5 million
Contract "Will Donald Trump visit Iran?"
Probability of Visit 4.7%
Timeframe Before Jan 1, 2027

How might a sustained closure of the Red Sea oil route impact global energy prices and inflation?

What are the potential economic consequences for the U.S. if the Iran blockade extends beyond July 2024?

Could the escalation of military strikes lead to a significant shift in prediction markets regarding other Middle Eastern diplomatic engagements?

like15
dislike
Must Read Next

Earnings

Corporate Actions

Stocks