US companies secure $2.03bn in UN procurement contracts in 2025
US companies secured $2.03 billion in UN contracts in 2025, led by pharmaceuticals. New York and New Jersey were top beneficiaries.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
United States companies received $2.03 billion in procurement contracts from United Nations organizations in 2025, maintaining the country's position as the largest supplier to the UN. The total contract value is comparable to the amount the U.S. pays in UN dues, according to data from the UN Global Marketplace. American firms secured more than 85% of all UN contracts valued at more than $1 million, with 32 UN organizations, including UNICEF and the UN Development Program, contracting with U.S. businesses.
"These numbers prove that the U.S. can do good and do well at the same time," said Peter Yeo, President of the Better World Campaign. He emphasized that UN contracts support American jobs and strengthen local economies while contributing to the UN's lifesaving work.
The U.S. retained its status as the leading supplier of pharmaceuticals to the UN, providing $921.2 million in products that support global health programs. Beyond pharmaceuticals, American companies were leading providers of management and administrative services ($254.9 million), engineering and research services ($225.5 million), transportation and logistics services ($99.7 million), and information technology and communications equipment ($95.4 million).
State-wise Contract Distribution
Contract awards were concentrated in specific states, with New York leading the list. The following table details the top states by contract value:
| State | Contract Value |
|---|---|
| New York | $624.9M |
| New Jersey | $342.7M |
| Delaware | $272M |
| California | $79.4M |
| Washington | $68.3M |
| Maine | $55.4M |
| Virginia | $49.8M |
| Texas | $35.6M |
| Washington, DC | $34.9M |
| Massachusetts | $29.9M |
Yeo noted that as policymakers consider America's relationship with the United Nations, these figures highlight the dual benefit of advancing U.S. interests globally while creating business opportunities for American companies and workers.
How might potential shifts in U.S. foreign policy or UN funding levels impact the volume of future procurement contracts for American firms?
Will the high concentration of contracts in specific states like New York and New Jersey influence regional political support for the UN?
Are emerging markets or developing nations beginning to challenge U.S. dominance in specific sectors like pharmaceuticals or IT?

























