Hamas Awaits Mediator Response, Reaffirms Stage Two Ceasefire Commitment
Hamas has stated it is awaiting a formal response from mediators and remains committed to the Stage Two ceasefire agreement, per Tasnim. This follows Trump's announcement of a historic disarmament deal for Hamas and all armed groups in Gaza, involving a phased withdrawal plan mediated by Egypt, Qatar, Turkiye, and the U.S. Significant gaps persist over implementation, with over 1,200 Palestinian deaths recorded since the ceasefire took effect and Israel's formal endorsement still pending.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
President Donald Trump announced that the Board of Peace has reached a historic agreement for the complete disarmament of Hamas and all armed groups in Gaza. The deal, part of Trump's 20-point peace plan, outlines a phased approach to disarmament and Israeli withdrawal, mediated by Egypt, Qatar, Turkiye, and the United States. In the latest development, Hamas has stated it is awaiting a formal response from mediators on the ceasefire and remains committed to the Stage Two ceasefire agreement, according to Tasnim News Agency. Despite the White House's confidence, significant skepticism persists from both Israel and Hamas regarding the practical implementation of the terms.
Key Elements of the Agreement
The Board of Peace stated that Hamas agreed to a detailed roadmap for the next phase of the Gaza ceasefire. Officials confirmed that Hamas committed, for the first time, to relinquishing all weapons ahead of an Israeli withdrawal. The specific conditions triggering each phase are scheduled to be published within two weeks.
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Agreement Type | Complete disarmament of Hamas and all armed groups |
| Implementation | Phased approach with structured timelines |
| Conditions Publication | Within two weeks |
| Israeli Withdrawal | Phased withdrawal timeline to be finalized |
| Security Arrangement | International Stabilization Force and new Palestinian police |
| Governance | Transition to a new Palestinian government |
Divergence on Implementation Details
While Trump described the agreement as final, Reuters reported that a Hamas official characterized it only as a draft. A Hamas source indicated that the draft calls for heavy weapons to be stored under Palestinian control rather than Israeli oversight. Hamas negotiator Ghazi Hamad told Al Jazeera that the group will not proceed with disarmament until Israeli forces withdraw from Gaza. Hamas's latest statement affirming its commitment to Stage Two while awaiting a formal mediator response reflects this conditional stance, highlighting a critical gap between the diplomatic announcement and the operational reality on the ground.
Geopolitical Reactions and Ongoing Violence
U.S. officials expressed strong confidence that Israel will adhere to the deal, noting that Iran had attempted to persuade Hamas to reject the arrangement but failed. However, Israel's formal endorsement remains unconfirmed. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth in Washington, but skepticism persists among Israeli officials about Hamas's willingness to surrender weapons.
The fragile nature of the truce was underscored by ongoing violence. Israeli strikes killed at least three people in Gaza, including two children. Gaza health officials reported that deaths have exceeded 1,200 Palestinians since the ceasefire took effect. The plan is overseen by the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza and aligns with U.N. Security Council Resolution 2803.
Ground Reality
The disparity between the diplomatic narrative and ground realities is evident in the casualty figures. With over 1,200 deaths since the ceasefire began, the operational effectiveness of the current truce remains questionable. The lack of confirmed Israeli endorsement, Hamas's insistence on pre-withdrawal disarmament conditions, and the pending formal mediator response suggest that the agreement continues to face significant implementation hurdles.
How will the discrepancy between Hamas's demand for pre-withdrawal disarmament and Israel's security requirements impact the timeline for publishing the specific phase conditions within the next two weeks?
What are the potential market and geopolitical repercussions if Israel formally rejects the deal due to skepticism over Hamas's willingness to surrender weapons under Palestinian control?
How might the ongoing violence and rising casualty figures since the ceasefire began influence public support for the agreement among Israeli and Palestinian populations?

























