Prediction market bets on Amy Gleason as next Trump admin departure

1 min read     Updated on 17 Aug 2026, 12:28 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Shraddha JScanX News Team
AI Summary

Karoline Leavitt departs the Trump administration in August. Kalshi prediction markets show $7.2 million bet on future exits, with Amy Gleason leading at 44% probability. Susie Wiles and Howard Lutnick follow at 34% and 31%. Kash Patel's exit probability has dropped to 23%.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
48495471

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Karoline Leavitt, the White House Press Secretary, will leave the Trump administration at the end of August to focus on her young family. She plans to remain closely involved as an outside adviser and Republican voice ahead of the midterms. Her exit follows several high-ranking departures, including Kristi Noem, Pam Bondi, and Joe Kent.

Prediction Market Data

Speculation regarding the next official to depart the Donald Trump administration is reflected in betting markets. Data from Kalshi, a federally authorized betting platform, shows that over $7.2 million has been wagered on the contract "Who will leave their role in the Trump administration this year?"

Bettors have assigned the highest probability to Amy Gleason, the acting administrator of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), at 44%.

Susie Wiles, the White House Chief of Staff, holds the second-highest probability at 34%, up by 95 basis points. Howard Lutnick, the Secretary of Commerce, is a close third with a 31% probability.

Official: Role: Exit Probability:
Amy Gleason: Acting Administrator, DOGE: 44%
Susie Wiles: White House Chief of Staff: 34%
Howard Lutnick: Secretary of Commerce: 31%

Kash Patel Exit Rumors

Rumors surrounding the potential exit of Kash Patel, the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, have diminished. Reports indicated that Donald Trump was reportedly unhappy with Patel. However, the probability of Patel exiting the administration has declined to 23% around the end of the year.

Disclaimer: Kalshi and Benzinga have an existing data collaboration agreement.

How might Karoline Leavitt's transition to an outside adviser role influence Republican messaging strategy ahead of the midterm elections?

What impact could the departure of multiple high-ranking officials, including Leavitt and Noem, have on the operational stability of the Trump administration?

Does the high betting probability for Amy Gleason's exit signal internal conflicts within the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)?

like15
dislike

Trump administration awards over $2B to four battery and minerals firms

2 min read     Updated on 08 Aug 2026, 02:03 AM
scanx
Reviewed by
Ritika DScanX News Team
AI Summary

The Trump administration is providing over $2 billion to four battery and minerals companies. Key allocations include a $1.4 billion Pentagon loan to Sila Nanotechnologies and a $400 million agreement with Australia's Sunrise Energy Metals for scandium production. This funding supports strategic supply chain goals.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
47680384

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

The Trump administration has announced the allocation of more than $2 billion to four companies specializing in battery materials and minerals. The funding package aims to bolster domestic supply chains and strategic material production, with significant portions directed toward loan agreements with key industry players. This move underscores the government's focus on securing critical resources through direct financial support to private sector entities.

Among the recipients is Sila Nanotechnologies, a startup that has been awarded a $1.4 billion loan from the Pentagon. A White House official confirmed the award, highlighting the substantial scale of the support provided to the emerging technology firm. The funding is part of a broader initiative to strengthen the nation's battery infrastructure and reduce reliance on external sources for critical components.

Australia's Sunrise Energy Metals has also secured a major financial commitment, entering into a $400 million loan agreement with the Pentagon. This agreement is specifically designated to facilitate the production of scandium, a rare earth metal increasingly important for advanced manufacturing and defense applications. The deal represents a significant international collaboration within the framework of US national security procurement.

Funding Breakdown

The total allocation exceeds $2 billion across the four identified companies. While specific details for all recipients are not fully disclosed in the initial announcement, the two largest individual awards account for $1.8 billion of the total sum.

Company Funding Amount Purpose
Sila Nanotechnologies $1.4 billion Pentagon loan
Sunrise Energy Metals $400 million Scandium production

Strategic Implications

The distribution of funds reflects a targeted approach to addressing vulnerabilities in the supply chain for critical minerals and battery technologies. By providing large-scale loans rather than grants, the administration is leveraging federal credit to de-risk private investment in these sectors. The inclusion of an Australian entity like Sunrise Energy Metals suggests that the definition of 'domestic' supply chain security may extend to allied nations with stable regulatory environments.

What the Numbers Show

The concentration of capital in just two named entities—Sila Nanotechnologies and Sunrise Energy Metals—indicates a high-stakes strategy focused on specific technological bottlenecks. With $1.8 billion of the over $2 billion total committed to these two firms, the remaining amount for the other two companies is relatively small. This disparity suggests that the primary strategic objectives are tied directly to the capabilities of Sila in battery technology and Sunrise in scandium production, rather than a broad-based subsidy program.

How might the heavy reliance on Pentagon loans rather than grants impact the long-term financial stability and repayment obligations of Sila Nanotechnologies and Sunrise Energy Metals?

What are the potential geopolitical repercussions for China and other major rare earth producers in response to this US-led consolidation of battery supply chain security with allied nations like Australia?

Will the inclusion of an Australian entity in this 'domestic' supply chain initiative set a precedent for future US defense procurement contracts to prioritize allied nations over strictly domestic manufacturers?

like16
dislike