NGT disposes BCCL illegal mining case citing parallel jurisdiction
- NGT disposed of illegal mining allegations against Bharat Coking Coal Ltd on October 8, 2026
- Tribunal cited parallel jurisdiction with Jharkhand High Court as reason for disposal
- Case involved alleged violations of Environment Protection Act, 1986 at Dhanbad sites

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Bharat Coking Coal Limited informed stock exchanges that the National Green Tribunal (NGT) has disposed of a litigation alleging illegal mining at its sites in Jharkhand. The tribunal declined to exercise jurisdiction as identical reliefs are pending before the High Court of Jharkhand.
Litigation details
The disposal relates to Original Application No. 57/2023/EZ, Ajay Rajak v. Ministry of Coal & Ors. The application, filed before the NGT Eastern Zone Bench in Kolkata, alleged violations of the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The petitioner contended that illegal mining was occurring at Central Surunga Paharigora, Parbad Laxmi Colliery, and other sites located at Alakdiha OP in District Dhanbad, Jharkhand.
Tribunal's reasoning
In its order dated October 8, 2026, the NGT stated it did not consider it proper to exercise parallel jurisdiction. This decision was based on the fact that identical reliefs are currently pending before the Hon'ble High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi. The company disclosed this development under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
Disclosure timeline
| Event | Date | Details |
|---|---|---|
| NGT Order | October 8, 2026 | Disposal of OA No. 57/2023/EZ |
| Company Disclosure | October 16, 2026 | Filed with BSE and NSE |
The company secretary and compliance officer, Debanuj Debnath, signed the disclosure letter to the listing departments of the Bombay Stock Exchange and the National Stock Exchange of India.
Historical Stock Returns for Bharat Coking Coal
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.53% | +1.53% | -1.88% | -3.90% | -21.66% | -21.66% |
How might the High Court of Jharkhand's eventual ruling on the identical reliefs impact BCCL's operational continuity at the Dhanbad sites?
What are the potential financial implications for BCCL if the High Court orders a temporary suspension of mining activities pending further investigation?
Could this jurisdictional precedent influence how other public sector mining companies in India manage parallel environmental litigation?


































