NSSF hails Trump executive order on hunting heritage and land access
- NSSF welcomes executive order protecting traditional ammunition use
- Order expands public land access and Sunday hunting opportunities
- $29 billion invested in conservation since 1937 via excise taxes
- $804 million of Feb 2026 state funds sourced from manufacturer taxes

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) has welcomed President Donald Trump’s executive order titled “Reinvigorating America’s Hunting Heritage,” citing its focus on protecting traditional ammunition and expanding public land access.
NSSF President and CEO Joe Bartozzi attended the Rose Garden unveiling of the order. He stated the administration is embracing commonsense policies to promote hunting and shooting sports across America.
Key Provisions
The executive order addresses several NSSF-priority issues:
- Protects the use of traditional ammunition and fishing tackle.
- Opens public land access through cooperative agreements with private landowners.
- Increases Sunday hunting opportunities on federal and state lands.
- Establishes an “open until closed” provision for public lands.
Conservation Funding Context
The source highlights the financial contribution of the industry to conservation efforts via the Pittman-Robertson excise tax.
| Metric | Amount | Source/Context |
|---|---|---|
| Total wildlife conservation investment since 1937 (inflation-adjusted) | $29 billion | Firearm and ammunition manufacturers |
| Excise tax rate | 10 and 11 percent | Paid by firearm and ammunition manufacturers |
| Funds apportioned to states in February 2026 | $804 million of $1.3 billion | Sourced from excise taxes |
NSSF opposes bans on traditional ammunition lacking peer-reviewed science establishing adverse wildlife impacts. The group argues that alternative ammunition requirements are several times more expensive, potentially pricing hunters out of the sport.
What the Numbers Show
The data indicates a heavy reliance on industry-funded mechanisms for conservation financing. Of the $1.3 billion apportioned to states in February 2026, $804 million was directly sourced from excise taxes paid by firearm and ammunition manufacturers. This suggests that nearly two-thirds of this specific disbursement cycle depends directly on the continued commercial activity of the sector the NSSF represents.
How might the expansion of public land access and Sunday hunting opportunities impact the revenue streams of outdoor recreation equipment manufacturers and local tourism economies?
What are the potential legal challenges or regulatory hurdles the 'open until closed' provision could face from environmental groups or state-level conservation agencies?
Could the protection of traditional ammunition standards influence international trade dynamics or export regulations for U.S.-based firearm and ammunition manufacturers?
























