Metropolitan Water District calls for long-term Colorado River agreement
- U.S. Bureau of Reclamation releases 2027-2028 Colorado River Operating Guidelines
- Framework requires 3.2 million acre-feet in Lower Basin contributions through 2028
- Metropolitan Water District cites need for long-term interstate agreement
- Southern California has cut imported water use from 2.5 to 1.2 million acre-feet

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Metropolitan Water District General Manager Shivaji Deshmukh has called for a renewed effort to forge a long-term agreement on Colorado River operations following the release of the 2027-2028 Operating Guidelines.
The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation released the guidelines, the Record of Decision for the Post-2026 Colorado River Operations Final EIS, and the August 24-month study. The new framework mandates 3.2 million acre-feet in contributions from the Lower Basin through 2028.
Operational Framework
Deshmukh stated that the guidelines are a necessary first step to manage immediate challenges arising from record-low snowpack. However, he emphasized that critical work remains to prevent shared reservoirs from reaching levels that could jeopardize water and power supplies.
Key provisions include:
- Allowing water users like Metropolitan to store water in Lake Mead as Intentionally Created Surplus.
- Creating a pathway for interstate exchanges to build cross-state partnerships.
- Enabling pooled funding for large-scale water supply projects, such as Pure Water Southern California.
Regional Impact
California agricultural and urban water users must develop agreements on how reductions will be shared within the state in the coming months. Deshmukh warned that renegotiating issues annually leaves the system vulnerable to crisis during dry years or legal battles.
Historical Context
Metropolitan has invested in storage, conservation, recycled water, and groundwater recovery for over two decades. These efforts have allowed Southern California to cut its use of imported water in half, from 2.5 million acre-feet a year to about 1.2 million acre-feet. The district remains prepared to make additional reductions alongside agricultural partners.
How might the requirement for 3.2 million acre-feet in Lower Basin contributions impact the financial viability of agricultural sectors in California and Arizona?
What specific legislative or regulatory hurdles could delay the formation of intra-state agreements for sharing water reductions in California?
To what extent will the new framework for pooled funding accelerate the timeline for large-scale projects like Pure Water Southern California?

























