Let Alberta Decide counters Calgary Chamber on economic risk
Let Alberta Decide challenged the Calgary Chamber of Commerce's stance on independence, citing $1 trillion in capital flight from Canada between 2015 and 2024 as a result of federal policy. The group argued that independence would grant Alberta control over crucial economic sectors, including resource regulation and trade, directly countering the Chamber's warnings of economic risk.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Let Alberta Decide responded to the Calgary Chamber of Commerce on June 24, 2026, asserting that federal policies, not the prospect of independence, pose the real economic risk to the province. The group argued that Alberta's economy has been constrained for more than a decade by federal regulations that have driven away investment and limited resource development. Keith Wilson, K.C., co-lead of Let Alberta Decide, stated that the Chamber's recent release focused on hypothetical fears while ignoring the economic reality caused by Ottawa's actions.
Wilson emphasized that Alberta remains one of Canada's strongest economies despite federal policies affecting energy, infrastructure, and agriculture. He noted that the province's assets, including farmland, oil and gas reserves, and a skilled workforce, remain firmly in place. "Alberta is not a branch office economy. Alberta is a producing economy," Wilson said, highlighting the province's capacity for independent economic success.
The group pointed to significant capital flight as evidence of the current system's failure. Recent economic analysis cited by Let Alberta Decide indicates that more than $1 trillion in investment left Canada between 2015 and 2024. Wilson argued that this exodus occurred due to unpredictable rules imposed by the federal government, rather than discussions surrounding independence. "Investment leaves when governments make the rules unpredictable — and Ottawa has done that to Alberta for more than a decade," Wilson said.
Let Alberta Decide outlined the potential benefits of independence, including authority over resource regulation, taxation, immigration policy, and trade agreements. Wilson rejected the Chamber's comparison to Brexit, stating that Alberta would be able to negotiate directly with its largest market, the United States, without federal interference. The group also criticized the Chamber's survey as non-representative, calling for the release of full methodology and data.
| Key Argument | Detail |
|---|---|
| Capital Flight | More than $1 trillion in investment left Canada between 2015 and 2024 |
| Economic Sectors Affected | Energy, infrastructure, agriculture, resource development |
| Proposed Independence Benefits | Control over resource regulation, taxation, immigration, trade policy |
Wilson concluded that Alberta possesses the resources, institutions, and workforce necessary to function as a successful independent country. The group maintains that the greatest threat to the province's economy is the continuation of federal policies that block and politicize key industries.
How might the United States respond to direct trade negotiations with an independent Alberta?
What specific legal mechanisms would be required to transfer federal regulatory authority to the province?
Could the uncertainty surrounding a potential independence vote trigger further short-term capital flight?
























