Kevin O'Leary says AI-driven 'tenderization' will reshape warfare
Shark Tank investor Kevin O'Leary predicts that AI and precision weapons will define future military strategy through a process he calls 'tenderization.' This method aims to weaken adversaries via targeted pressure without large-scale warfare. O'Leary's comments align with warnings from the Five Eyes alliance and insights from defense tech CEOs regarding AI's role in modern conflicts.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Shark Tank investor Kevin O'Leary stated that future conflicts will be defined by artificial intelligence, precision weapons, and advanced defense systems. He argued that these technologies allow the U.S. to pressure adversaries without relying on traditional large-scale warfare. O'Leary emphasized that this shift reduces the necessity for widespread casualties while maintaining strategic compliance.
O'Leary Details AI-Powered Warfare Strategy
In a post on X on Tuesday, O'Leary described a future warfare strategy he termed "tenderization." He argued that AI-powered systems could allow countries to weaken an opponent’s capabilities through sustained, targeted pressure. "If Iran doesn’t want to play ball, they will be tenderized into compliance," O'Leary wrote.
He explained that the approach involves "highly specific ordinance, satellite-controlled, AI-driven, predictive analysis on everything you need." O'Leary noted that these technology and operations would be managed from U.S.-based infrastructure. "You don’t have to kill a lot of people. You don’t wanna do that," he said, arguing that precision weapons and AI could reduce the need for traditional warfare methods. "This is going to be a new type of warfare. This is called tenderization," he added.
O'Leary also called for greater investment in AI-powered defense systems. "That’s what we need in America. That’s what I’m building, and that’s what every other developer’s gonna have to build," he stated.
AI Reshaping Cybersecurity And Modern Warfare
Earlier, the Five Eyes intelligence alliance warned that rapid AI advances could accelerate cyberattacks. The alliance stated that adversaries could use AI to identify vulnerabilities, generate malicious code, and automate operations faster. They urged organizations to prepare within months rather than years.
XTEND CEO Aviv Shapira said the future of defense technology could rely on AI-powered platforms. These platforms would connect drones, robots, and autonomous systems across manufacturers. Shapira described XTEND’s vision as an "Android of robotics" designed to unify defense hardware through software.
Palantir CEO Alex Karp said AI was providing the U.S. and its allies with a strategic advantage. He argued that AI was transforming modern warfare by improving intelligence sharing and battlefield coordination amid rising Middle East tensions.
How might adversaries evolve their military strategies to counter or bypass AI-driven 'tenderization' tactics?
What are the ethical and legal implications of relying on AI for targeted military operations without human oversight?
How will increased investment in AI-powered defense systems impact the allocation of resources within the U.S. defense budget?






















