Iran Parliament Speaker criticizes US military escalation amid fresh strikes

1 min read     Updated on 21 Jul 2026, 11:17 AM
scanx
Reviewed by
Shriram SScanX News Team
AI Summary

Iran's Parliament Speaker, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, criticized the United States for escalating regional conflict by deploying new military equipment while claiming to seek peace. The U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) announced fresh strikes on Iranian targets ordered by President Donald Trump, marking ten consecutive days of military action. Concurrently, the Houthis initiated a naval blockade in the Bab al-Mandeb Strait, potentially reducing global oil supply by 7%. Maritime security incidents have also increased, with an oil tanker struck off the coast of Oman.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
46158414

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Iran's Parliament Speaker, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, criticized the United States on Monday for escalating regional conflict through the deployment of new military equipment. Ghalibaf stated that while Washington claims to desire a cessation of hostilities, its actions contradict these statements. He asserted that Tehran has fully recognized these tactics and has prepared accordingly.

Ghalibaf's Accusations

In a post on X, Ghalibaf mocked U.S. intelligence assessments, suggesting that Washington was measuring Iran's capabilities using its own "meager" IQ as a benchmark. He emphasized that actions must align with claims, criticizing the discrepancy between U.S. diplomatic rhetoric and military escalation. The Speaker declared that Iran has reached a stage of complete mastery in understanding what he termed "American antics."

US Military Actions

The U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) announced it had conducted fresh strikes on Iranian targets in the region at the behest of President Donald Trump. These operations mark ten consecutive days of strikes on Iran. President Trump stated that the strikes were a retaliation for the killing of U.S. service members. The military escalation follows a period of heightened tension involving various regional actors.

Maritime and Economic Impact

The conflict has begun to impact global trade routes and energy supplies. The Houthis announced the initiation of a naval blockade of Saudi Arabia in the Bab al-Mandeb Strait. According to a report by Reuters, this blockade is expected to affect the global oil supply by 7%. Additionally, the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations Center (UKMTO) reported an incident involving an oil tanker struck by an unknown projectile approximately 9 miles off Limah, Oman. The crew abandoned the vessel via lifeboats following the strike, which occurred in an area where a vessel had previously caught fire.

Incident Location Impact/Detail
Fresh Strikes Iranian targets in region 10 consecutive days of operations
Naval Blockade Bab al-Mandeb Strait 7% reduction in global oil supply
Oil Tanker Strike 9 miles off Limah, Oman Crew abandoned vessel via lifeboats

How will the sustained ten-day campaign of US strikes influence Iran's future calculus regarding direct retaliation versus proxy warfare?

What is the projected impact on global energy prices if the Houthi blockade of the Bab al-Mandeb Strait persists beyond the immediate term?

Could the disconnect between US diplomatic calls for de-escalation and military actions drive Iran to accelerate its nuclear program as a deterrent?

like20
dislike

Bolton says IRGC controls Iran, calls for dismantling

1 min read     Updated on 21 Jul 2026, 09:43 AM
scanx
Reviewed by
Anirudha BScanX News Team
AI Summary

Former National Security Advisor John Bolton stated that Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) controls the country's military decisions, rendering civilian leadership largely irrelevant. He argued that the United States should prioritize dismantling the IRGC to facilitate regime change, citing recent attacks on U.S. bases. Bolton suggested maintaining sanctions and a naval blockade while targeting the IRGC's military capabilities.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
46152808

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Former National Security Advisor John Bolton stated that Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) controls Tehran's military decisions and argued that the United States should make dismantling the group its primary objective. Bolton asserted that the IRGC, rather than the country's civilian leadership, is directing military operations and making key security decisions. He emphasized that eliminating the IRGC is a necessary step for any potential regime change in Iran.

IRGC's Role in Iran

Bolton posted on X on Monday, sharing his NewsNation interview, where he wrote, "The Revolutionary Guard is calling the shots in Iran." He added that statements from civilians carry little weight given the IRGC's authority. During the interview, he reiterated that the Iran Revolutionary Guard is running the military operations, functioning autonomously from the civilian government.

Call for Military Action

Citing recent attacks on U.S. bases and the deaths of American service members, Bolton called for a broader military objective beyond mere retaliation. "Our objective should not just be to retaliate for this particular tragedy, but to flatten the Revolutionary Guard entirely," he said. He believes this is the only way to create a possibility for regime change in Iran.

Strategic Recommendations

Bolton backed maintaining sanctions and a naval blockade while specifically targeting the IRGC's military capabilities. He identified several assets as legitimate targets, including missiles, missile launchers, drones, and fast boats. He expressed skepticism regarding the success of diplomacy, stating that the IRGC's autonomous function necessitates its elimination to achieve strategic goals.

How might Iran's regional allies respond to a U.S. campaign targeting the IRGC?

What are the potential economic and humanitarian impacts of a naval blockade on Iran?

Could dismantling the IRGC lead to a power vacuum or further destabilization in the region?

like18
dislike