Iran's IRGC Commander Warns of Power Cut to U.S. Allies if Infrastructure Attacked

2 min read     Updated on 23 Jul 2026, 04:09 AM
scanx
Reviewed by
Shraddha JScanX News Team
AI Summary

Iran's IRGC Aerospace Commander Mousavi, cited by Tasnim News Agency, has warned that Tehran will cut off electricity to U.S. regional allies in retaliation for any strikes on Iranian bridges or power plants. The warning follows reported explosions in Bandar Abbas and Ahvaz, and U.S. attacks on bridge infrastructure in the Hormozgan region, including the Bandar Khamir Bridge and the Bandar Abbas-Khorstan-Lar Bridge, with power outages reported in Kahorstan areas.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
45616995

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Escalating military tensions between the United States and Iran have intensified, with Iran's Tasnim News Agency reporting that Tehran will retaliate by cutting off electricity to U.S. regional allies if Washington strikes Iranian bridges or power plants. IRGC Aerospace Commander Mousavi stated that this specific measure targeting power supply would be Iran's response to any attacks on its infrastructure. This warning follows reports of explosions in Bandar Abbas and Ahvaz, and confirmed U.S. attacks on key bridge infrastructure in the Hormozgan region. The reciprocal threats signal a deepening conflict with significant risks to critical infrastructure and energy security across the region.

Trump's Warning and Iranian Response

President Trump previously issued a direct warning stating that if ships are attacked, the United States will bomb bridges and power plants, including those in Tehran. In response, a military source cited by Iran's Tasnim News Agency stated that Tehran would retaliate by targeting infrastructure such as bridges or energy sites associated with the U.S. should Washington proceed with strikes on Iranian assets. Tasnim further reported that Iran is threatening to strike regional energy facilities if attacked. This exchange of threats marks a significant escalation in rhetoric, extending the potential scope of military action beyond the Hormozgan region to Iran's capital and U.S.-linked interests abroad.

Reported Explosions and Attacks

Three explosions were heard in western Bandar Abbas, Iran's port city, according to the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB). Iran's Hormozgan Governorate indicated that sounds heard in Bandar Abbas, surrounding coastal areas, and Gulf islands are linked to clashes in the Strait of Hormuz. Separately, Mehr News Agency reported that several locations in Iran's Ahvaz were targeted by U.S. attacks, with an additional explosion of unknown nature reported in the city.

Infrastructure Targeted

The reported strikes on bridge infrastructure remain a focal point of the conflict. The following table summarises the reported infrastructure incidents:

Parameter: Details
Bridge 1: Bandar Khamir Bridge, Hormozgan region
Reported Incident: Targeted in U.S. attack
Source: Iran's Fars News Agency
Bridge 2: Bandar Abbas-Khorstan-Lar Bridge (Bandar Abbas to Shiraz)
Reported Incident: Targeted in U.S. attack
Source: Tasnim News Agency reporter
Power Outages: Kahorstan areas affected
Regional Threat: Iran threatens to cut off electricity to U.S. regional allies
Source: Tasnim News Agency

The situation remains fluid across multiple Iranian cities and the broader Strait of Hormuz region. Information available is limited to reports from IRIB, IRNA, Mehr News, Fars News Agency, Tasnim News Agency, and Iran's Hormozgan Governorate. No further details regarding casualties or the full extent of damage have been provided.

How will these escalations impact global oil prices and shipping routes through the Strait of Hormuz?

What measures are U.S. regional allies taking to secure their energy infrastructure against potential Iranian retaliation?

Could this conflict draw in other regional or global powers, and if so, how might their involvement shift the dynamics?

like16
dislike

Senator Peters challenges Hegseth on Iran war strategy

1 min read     Updated on 22 Jul 2026, 07:00 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Anirudha BScanX News Team
AI Summary

Senator Gary Peters accused Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth of lacking a strategy to win the Iran war while requesting nearly $70 billion in additional funding. Hegseth defended the request, stating the conflict has cost $37.5 billion so far, and criticized Peters for smearing troop sacrifices. The exchange occurred amid resumed strikes following the collapse of a ceasefire framework.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
46272618

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Senator Gary Peters (D-Mich.) accused Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth of lacking a strategy to win the Iran war during a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing on Tuesday. Peters stated that despite Hegseth's failure to win the war, the administration is requesting nearly $70 billion in additional funding from Congress. The confrontation highlights growing tensions over the financial and human cost of the conflict, which has resulted in 18 U.S. military deaths and approximately 430 injuries.

Funding Request and Strategic Dispute

Peters labeled the funding request a "blank check" and criticized the Trump administration for an "utter and complete failure to win this war to this point." Hegseth rejected the criticism, arguing that such remarks "smears the sacrifice" of U.S. troops. He attributed the stalemate to the "political cowardice of Democrats" and warned that the Pentagon faces shortages without the additional funds.

Financial and Human Cost

Hegseth disclosed that the conflict has cost the United States $37.5 billion, including projected expenses through Sept. 30. The administration has requested nearly $90 billion overall, with the majority tied to Iran. Peters cited the human toll during the hearing, referencing 17 U.S. military deaths at the time, including troops killed in an Iranian attack in Jordan. The official toll later rose to 18 after a missing soldier was identified as deceased.

Metric Figure
Additional funding requested Nearly $70 billion
Total conflict cost to date $37.5 billion
Overall administration request Nearly $90 billion
U.S. military deaths 18
U.S. troops injured Approximately 430

Regional Impact and Ceasefire Collapse

The hearing followed the collapse of a Pakistan-mediated 60-day ceasefire framework. U.S. and Iranian forces have resumed daily strikes, and shipping disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz continue to pressure global energy markets. President Donald Trump compared the conflict to past wars on Truth Social, noting the duration and casualty count, a post that drew criticism from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.

How will the collapse of the Pakistan-mediated ceasefire affect the timeline for Congressional approval of the additional funding?

What impact will continued shipping disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz have on global energy prices in the coming quarter?

Could the Pentagon face operational readiness issues if Congress delays the funding request due to bipartisan strategic disputes?

like19
dislike