Physician pay trails inflation as productivity drops, MGMA reports
MGMA's 2026 report reveals that physician pay growth failed to match inflation in 2025, with only surgical specialists keeping pace. Productivity dropped significantly, particularly among nonsurgical specialists, exacerbating workforce challenges. Medical groups are increasingly relying on Advanced Practice Providers and hybrid compensation models to navigate shortages and burnout.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
For the first time in several years, physician productivity and compensation moved in opposite directions in 2025, highlighting the strain on the U.S. physician workforce, according to new data from the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA). The 2026 Provider Compensation and Productivity Data report, based on 2025 data from more than 245,900 physicians and advanced practice providers, found that compensation growth remained modest and trailed inflation. With inflation rising 2.7% during the year, only surgical specialists managed to keep pace with the cost of living, while primary care and nonsurgical specialists fell behind.
Compensation vs. Inflation
The report details specific compensation increases across physician categories, showing a clear disparity with inflation rates. Primary care physician compensation rose 2.23%, while surgical specialist compensation increased 2.90%. Nonsurgical specialist compensation grew by 1.79%. Over a five-year period, the Consumer Price Index rose 16.37%, outpacing the cumulative pay gains for primary care physicians (15.04%) and nonsurgical specialists (11.06%). Surgical specialists saw a 16.33% increase over the same five years, roughly matching inflation.
Productivity and Workforce Challenges
Productivity metrics declined even as pay increased, particularly among nonsurgical specialists, whose total patient visits fell 15.67% in a single year. The data suggests that physicians are scarce, compelling medical groups to offer higher compensation regardless of output. The Association of American Medical Colleges projects a U.S. physician shortage of up to 86,000 by 2036. Additionally, one in three medical groups lost a physician to burnout in the past year, up from roughly one in four in late 2024.
Key Compensation and Productivity Metrics
| Category | 1-Year Change | 5-Year Change |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Care Physician Compensation | 2.23% | 15.04% |
| Surgical Specialist Compensation | 2.90% | 16.33% |
| Nonsurgical Specialist Compensation | 1.79% | 11.06% |
| Consumer Price Index (CPI) | 2.70% | 16.37% |
| Nonsurgical Specialist Patient Visits | -15.67% | N/A |
Strategic Shifts in Staffing and Pay
In response to these pressures, 48% of medical groups added Advanced Practice Providers (APPs) relative to physicians over the past year to maintain patient access. APP compensation outpaced physician gains over five years in every grouping. Furthermore, hybrid compensation models—blending base salary with quality and other incentives—now account for more than 75% of reported structures, replacing pure salary and productivity models. Guaranteed starting pay for newly hired physicians eased from recent highs, most sharply for nonsurgical specialists at -6.77%, though levels remain above those seen in 2021.
Future Outlook
The disconnect between pay and productivity is expected to deepen in 2026 due to Medicare's new productivity "efficiency adjustment," which took effect on January 1, 2026. This adjustment reduces workload scores for many non-time-based procedures, impacting hard-to-recruit specialties such as urology, interventional cardiology, and diagnostic radiology. MGMA's acting CEO, Akash Madiah, noted that compensation and staffing decisions made today are critical for determining whether practices can meet demand and remain viable in a pressured system.
How will Medicare's new productivity 'efficiency adjustment' in 2026 specifically accelerate the decline in compensation for hard-to-recruit specialties like urology and diagnostic radiology?
Will the continued substitution of physicians with Advanced Practice Providers (APPs) eventually impact patient outcomes or referral patterns despite maintaining access?
What specific retention strategies will medical groups need to adopt to curb the rising burnout rates that are now affecting one in three physicians?

































