Trump approval at 35% as voters expect gas prices to rise

1 min read     Updated on 10 Jun 2026, 04:28 AM
scanx
Reviewed by
Shriram SScanX News Team
AI Summary

A Reuters/Ipsos poll shows Trump's approval at 35% with 59% of voters expecting gas prices to rise due to the Iran War. Disapproval of his cost-of-living management is 70%, worse than Biden's final ratings. Voters favor Democrats over Republicans by 41% to 37% in hypothetical congressional elections.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
42591507

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

A new Reuters/Ipsos poll shows President Donald Trump with a 35% approval rating, unchanged from mid-May, as 59% of voters expect gas prices to worsen following the U.S. attack on Iran in February. The disapproval rating stands at 63%, resulting in a net approval of -28, just above the 34% low recorded in April during his second term. Voter sentiment on economic management and foreign policy appears to be driving the negative outlook.

Voter sentiment on gas prices and Iran War

The poll highlights significant pessimism regarding the economic impact of the Iran War. Only 17% of voters believe gas prices will improve, while 13% expect them to stay the same. The majority, 59%, anticipate prices will get worse, with 11% unsure or skipping the question.

Regarding the military action in Iran, only 25% of voters consider it worth it, compared to 53% who say it is not. The remaining 23% are unsure or did not respond.

Cost-of-living management disapproval

Voters express strong dissatisfaction with Trump's handling of the cost-of-living. Only 22% approve of his management in this area, while 70% disapprove. This rating is worse than the final marks for former President Joe Biden, who had a 29% approval and 63% disapproval for cost-of-living management at the end of his term during a period of high inflation.

Metric Trump Biden (End of Term)
Approval 22% 29%
Disapproval 70% 63%

Congressional election outlook

The negative sentiment toward Trump's management and the ongoing conflict in Iran may impact future electoral prospects. If congressional elections were held today, voters are more likely to support the Democratic candidate over the Republican candidate by a 41% to 37% margin. The remaining voters are undecided or did not indicate a preference.

How might sustained high gas prices influence voter turnout in the upcoming congressional elections?

Could the ongoing conflict in Iran lead to a shift in Republican campaign strategies away from economic issues?

What are the chances that the current disapproval ratings will impact Trump's policy decisions regarding the Iran War?

like17
dislike

Trump names William Pulte acting Director of National Intelligence

0 min read     Updated on 10 Jun 2026, 04:05 AM
scanx
Reviewed by
Anirudha BScanX News Team
AI Summary

President Trump announced via Truth Social that William Pulte will become acting Director of National Intelligence on June 19th. Pulte will continue to serve as Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency and Chairman of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac while working closely with Tulsi Gabbard.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
42284570

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

President Trump announced that William Pulte will assume the role of acting Director of National Intelligence effective Friday, June 19th. In a post on Truth Social, Trump confirmed that Pulte is working closely with Tulsi Gabbard on the transition. The President highlighted that Pulte will retain his current positions, serving simultaneously as the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency and Chairman of government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Appointment Details

The appointment allows Pulte to oversee national intelligence functions while maintaining his leadership at the housing finance regulator. Trump noted Pulte's close collaboration with the outgoing administration to ensure a smooth handover. The dual role signifies a significant expansion of Pulte's portfolio within the federal government.

How will the Senate Intelligence Committee view the confirmation of a dual-housed appointee lacking traditional intelligence experience?

What potential conflicts of interest could arise from Pulte retaining oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac while accessing classified economic intelligence?

Will this unprecedented dual role lead to a restructuring of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to accommodate part-time leadership?

like16
dislike