Schiff says owning MSTR is the worst way to play Bitcoin
Economist Peter Schiff criticized Strategy Inc's recent Bitcoin acquisition, arguing it destroyed shareholder value and resulted in a negative Bitcoin yield. Schiff claimed the company is sitting on a loss of more than $6 million from the purchase of 1,550 Bitcoin. The comments sparked a debate over leverage, dilution, and the sustainability of the firm's strategy.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Economist Peter Schiff criticized Strategy Inc's recent Bitcoin acquisition, arguing that the purchase destroyed shareholder value and resulted in a negative Bitcoin yield. In an X post on June 9, Schiff sparked a debate over leverage, dilution, and the sustainability of Michael Saylor’s Bitcoin accumulation strategy. He claimed Strategy is already sitting on a loss of more than $6 million from its recent purchase of 1,550 Bitcoin. Over the past five days, MSTR is down over 8%.
According to Schiff, the acquisition not only lost value as Bitcoin declined but also reduced Bitcoin per share. "Even if you are bullish on Bitcoin, owning MSTR is the worst way to make that bet," Schiff said. The comments come as investors increasingly scrutinize Strategy’s capital structure following its first reported Bitcoin sale since 2022 and the expansion of multiple Bitcoin-linked preferred share offerings.
Not everyone agreed with Schiff’s assessment. Trader ZeroReserveNews acknowledged that the negative Bitcoin yield calculation was "mechanically correct" for the specific transaction but argued the analysis ignored Strategy’s broader financial position. According to the trader, the company deliberately built a roughly $1 billion cash reserve to avoid issuing additional shares or selling Bitcoin during periods of market weakness.
The trader argued that the debate should focus on balancing dilution risks against dividend obligations rather than presenting a simple choice between owning Bitcoin and owning MSTR. Schiff remained unconvinced and responded, "But MSTR will burn through that cash paying dividends of preferred shares. Then what?"
How will Strategy's $1 billion cash reserve impact its ability to sustain dividend payments on preferred shares during prolonged Bitcoin market weakness?
What are the potential long-term effects of continued share dilution on MSTR's attractiveness to investors compared to holding Bitcoin directly?
Could Strategy's recent Bitcoin sale signal a shift in its accumulation strategy, and how might this affect market perception of its capital structure?































