BitGo, Derive integrate to enable regulated custody for onchain derivatives trading
BitGo and Derive Labs have partnered to allow institutional investors to trade onchain derivatives while retaining custody of collateral in BitGo's OCC-regulated trust bank. This integration reduces counterparty risk and commingling issues, leveraging Derive's $30 billion cumulative notional volume and 90% share of onchain options activity. The move aligns digital asset trading with traditional institutional standards of separated custody and execution.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
BitGo Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: BTGO) and Derive Labs, Inc. have integrated their platforms to expand institutional access to onchain derivatives markets while preserving regulated custody standards. The collaboration enables eligible institutional clients to trade options and perpetual futures on Derive’s exchange while keeping collateral within BitGo Bank & Trust, National Association, an Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) regulated digital asset trust bank. This structural separation of asset custody from trade execution aims to mitigate exchange counterparty exposure, eliminate asset commingling risks, and reduce operational complexity for institutional participants.
The integration addresses a critical gap in the digital asset ecosystem where institutions previously had to compromise on preferred custody models to access onchain liquidity. By leveraging BitGo’s regulated infrastructure, clients can utilize Derive’s electronic execution, portfolio margining, and multi-asset collateral systems without transferring assets to the exchange. This model supports more capital-efficient participation in onchain markets while maintaining the operational controls and risk management standards expected by compliance teams.
Key Integration Features
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Custody Provider | BitGo Bank & Trust, National Association (OCC regulated) |
| Trading Venue | Derive Labs, Inc. (Onchain derivatives exchange) |
| Supported Products | Onchain options and perpetual futures |
| Risk Mitigation | Separation of custody from execution; reduced counterparty risk |
| Margining | Portfolio margining and multi-asset collateral support |
Adam Sporn, Head of Institutional Sales and Prime Brokerage at BitGo, emphasized the importance of this model for long-term adoption. "Institutional markets are built on the separation of custody and trading," Sporn said. "We believe bringing that same model to digital assets is critical for the continued long-term institutional adoption. As new sources of liquidity emerge, our goal is to enable clients to maintain a consistent, trusted custody and operational framework while accessing execution that best fits their strategy."
Nick Forster, Founder and CEO of Derive, highlighted the demand for hedging and yield generation tools that cannot be replicated through spot trading alone. "Until now, accessing these markets onchain has often required institutions to compromise on their preferred custody model," Forster stated. "By integrating with BitGo, clients can access Derive’s liquidity and capital-efficient margin system while keeping their underlying assets within the custody framework their risk and compliance teams already trust."
Market Context and Scale
Derive brings significant market depth to the integration, having processed more than $30 billion in cumulative notional volume. The platform represents approximately 90% of onchain options activity and has operated for more than five years without a security or insolvency incident. This track record provides institutional clients with established electronic derivatives liquidity, now accessible through BitGo’s broader infrastructure which includes custody, wallets, staking, trading, financing, stablecoins, and settlement services.
What the Numbers Show
The concentration of market activity on Derive, accounting for approximately 90% of onchain options activity, underscores a growing preference for centralized liquidity pools even within decentralized finance contexts. However, the historical requirement to deposit assets directly with exchanges created a single point of failure for custodial risk. By decoupling the $30 billion+ volume engine from the custody layer, BitGo and Derive are effectively productizing the traditional financial industry’s standard practice of segregated custody. This shift suggests that institutional capital deployment in digital assets is maturing beyond simple spot holding toward sophisticated derivatives strategies, provided the regulatory and operational friction of self-custody or unregulated exchange custody is removed. The success of this model will likely depend on the ability of BitGo Bank & Trust to scale its OCC-regulated operations to handle the velocity of derivatives trading without introducing latency or operational bottlenecks.
How might BitGo's OCC-regulated custody model influence regulatory scrutiny on other decentralized finance platforms seeking institutional partnerships?
What specific technical challenges must BitGo overcome to ensure its infrastructure can handle the high-frequency latency requirements of derivatives trading without bottlenecks?
Will this integration prompt major traditional financial institutions to accelerate their adoption of onchain derivatives, or will they remain cautious due to smart contract risks?

































